http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/03/10/califiornia-election-official-proposes-measure-strike-marriage-state-laws/

SACRAMENTO– California’s top election official says supporters can start collecting signatures for a proposed ballot measure to strike the word “marriage” from all state laws. Supporters of this ballot measure want to replace it with the term “domestic partnership,” while keeping all the rights of marriage in place.  The proposal is in response to a voter-approved gay marriage ban that passed in November. The new measure would repeal the ban, and define domestic partnerships as unions between all couples, regardless of sexual orientation. Secretary of State Debra Bowen said Tuesday that supporters must gather nearly 700,000 signatures by early August to get the initiative on the ballot.The measure is the grassroots effort of two heterosexual college students.

Who is this woman, one might ask- and where did she get the White kids? Why, it is none other than Rozita Swinton herself,  who purportedly made the fake phone call about the flds, siccing the feds upon them and taking away their children en masse.  It still doesn’t make sense to me. Since when is black Amerika so concerned with making calls to CPS/DHS/whatever commie-scum agency regarding the ‘plight of White children’  in Mormon Fundamentalist communities? Is it a subculture that has somehow fallen off the radar?  I dunno, but I don’t think so. I would bet most of those not of the Caucasian Persuasion care or have even heard of FLDS.  Something doesn’t smell right in Texas. I wrote about this last year  https://silentconsort.wordpress.com/2008/04/25/flds-big-hate-big-brother/

Whatever  her role  as loony-toon and/or government tool, many children and families were most certainly harmed by the whole debacle. For more strange pics of Swinton and story: (if link leads you to a 404  error page, click on the blog banner and it is on the front page)

http://www.flds.ws/2009/03/08/while-465-children-recover-rozita-destroys-more-foster-children/

I’ve written so much on this blog about this case- Being a parent myself, I can only imagine the hell of anonymous vultures speaking poorly about someone I loved so dearly who perished so horribly.  If I had died so horribly, I would have wanted a father who would be like Mr. Christian.  A father who would not hold back what he felt, who would be angry and who would want to avenge me, rather than candlelight vigils, a father who would face the media again and again unafraid. How can a man not be filled with rage to lose his beautiful daughter? How can he NOT be angry?  It’s NORMAL.  When one’s child has been raped, tortured, forced to drink bleach and killled, one   should be able to check exempt status when it comes to being  ‘politically correct’. Forever. Gary Christian needs reparations and I hope he gets them.  

What most of these posters are doing with their inaccurate speculation is not consciously trying to offend the Christians, but rather comfort themselves, thinking  to themselves “there must be something that could have been controlled, something I can tell my kids to do or not do, something that will make the chance of this happening to my kids not so real and scary.” If they come up with some little mantra , some little litany to repeat, they might feel safer. Blaming the victim is part of that ‘isolated incident’  BS yourself thinking. It is a lot less threatning to think that if only this one or two variables were eliminated, Channon and Chris would be alive.  Not only are the comments about ” Duh , they shouldn’t have been in the ghetto, thye were asking for it” inaccurate  as the fact is they were taken from a non-ghetto area and brought there, but it makes the assumption that if you are around Certain Groups – you deserve to get tortured and killed. Then the same people, who do not work for NASA- make a big point of preceeding that lame premise with the oxymoronic disclaimer “I’m not a racist, but…”  OK, we get it. They would rather Blame the Victim than be Politically Incorrect. Love everyone, we’re all Gawd’s Chillun, but realize YOU are saying if you’re a White kid who gets around ghetto blacks, you’re gonna get killed, everyone knows that. Ghetto= black=death.  White + Ghetto= death.  Well, they are partially  right, those posters. They’re just not right about where the murdered kids started out, which was not the Rainbow We’re All Really The Same Valley of Death.  I know, I’m an Official Hater therefore  It Can’t Be True. Yeah, keep telling youselves that. So, for all those posters who think all they have to do to make themselves feel safe is make up lies or try to find made-up reasons other than free-floating Evil-  know that you’re not safe- those kids did not willingly go to the ghetto. The ghetto came to them. 

~

Gary Christian Speaks Out

Gary Christian Speaks Out

“This ain’t Daddy and Mama defending their little baby girl. I’ve got facts, I’ve got proof,” Christian said. “When you start criticizing the best of her, you’ve got real, real problem with me.”

Thursday, the Christians say they maintain their support of anonymous online web comments, despite the difficulties.

“We don’t have a problem with people talking, we don’t even have a problem with opinions we disagree with.”

http://www.wbir.com/news/local/story.aspx?storyid=80257&provider=top many reader comments  at bottom of page

http://www.volunteertv.com/home/headlines/40827607.html

 

“I will never see a morning that I don’t hurt,” he said.

“They deserve to die,” Gary said.

 

Deena and Gary Christian

Deena and Gary Christian

The second front takes place in the anonymous community of cyberspace.

Gary and Deena told Volunteer TV News that they’ve been angered and hurt by a number of Internet rumors appearing in the comment sections of various websites.

“We’ve got enough to deal with,” he said about the various rumors and theories floating around the internet that deal with what happened the night the young couple disappeared, “we really don’t need to deal with that.”

Channon’s mother recalled one of the specific statements which claimed the young couple was in the wrong part of town the night they were carjacked.

“Well if they were down there riding around, then they got what was coming to them,” she said, paraphrasing what she recalled from the comment.

“My daughter and Chris were not riding around in a bad place and got carjacked,” Gary said. “They were taken to Chipman Street by force.” 

Police quickly determined during their investigation that the couple was carjacked near Knoxville Center Mall and Washington Ridge Apartment complex. The apartment complex is located a little more than three miles and about 10 minutes by car from Chipman Street. Channon’s parents have also been bothered by rumors that she was in the Chipman Street area looking for drugs. Gary decided to quash it by obtaining Channon’s drug test results from her former healthcare employer as well as her autopsy results. Gary obtained Channon’s drug test results from her former employer, a healthcare company as well as the medical examiner’s toxicology report which was conducted during her autopsy.

“She had taken no prescription or non-prescription drugs,” he said. “No marijuana, no cocaine, no ecstasy, no nothing.”

Letalvius Cobbins will be the first suspect tried for the murders of Channon Christian and Christopher Newsom. It’s scheduled to begin on July 6th. Vanessa Coleman’s trial starts on August 10th, Lemaricus Davison’s trial starts on September 21st and George Thomas’s starts on November 20th.

Any attempt by a court to impose a policy on either the newspaper or its readers is unconstitutional, Hollow said.  “What the court is asking us to do is … set up a board of censorship,” Hollow said.  Baumgartner said he will issue a written ruling later.  http://www.knoxnews.com/news/2009/feb/28/judge-questions-media-intent-web-commentary/

A judge overseeing the death-penalty trials of four defendants in the torture-slaying of a young Knoxville couple was asked Friday to tame inflammatory public comments on local media Web sites.   http://www.wsmv.com/technology/18820442/detail.html
 Attorney Scott Green said action was needed to ensure a fair trial for his client Letalvis Cobbins and a jury pool untainted by inflammatory postings by anonymous writers……asked the judge to either bar media Web sites from allowing online readers to post comments on stories about the case or require news organizations to police the commentary by requiring posters to provide verifiable identifying information.   http://blogs.knoxnews.com/knx/silence/archives/2009/02/lawyers_seek_to.shtml

 Thomas Dillard, attorney for suspect George Thomas, filed a petition asking the judge to either ban media websites from allowing readers to post comments about the case or to require the news organizations to “continuously monitor, in real time” comments. Dillard asks that the websites only allow comments made under poster’s actual names and only those that comments that would be deemed “printable and publishable by the news outlet personnel themselves.”   http://worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=90340

Waa Waa  Waa.. Hey Defense Attorneys: It must truly suck to defend the indefensible -you  have nothing to use as an excuse, as a cause- because any THING that would do such Evil does not  deserve to live, let alone be subsidized till death occurs many years later.  What exactly does a defense attorney say/do when there is no question the entire gang of them were there at some point , and the result of such?  Try to shut up the media that largely ignored the story until pushed- What could they possibly say to justify the actions of any of the defendants? The fact that the case did get any attention at all can be attributed to rallies, websites, forums, blogs, videos-a great number of people participated in bringing this to light- some center-stage, some behind the scenes- all contributing which eventually gave rise to the mainstream media shaking its head begrudgingly like a sullen child forced to apologize:  “EvilNaziRacistHaters we hate YOU, but umm yeahhh..you’re right. This crew really are Dante’s Inferno Rejects. ”  

What cliche excuse would they use?  ” I fell through the cracks.”   “I  was on crack”, ” My momma  smoked crack”  or ” I didn’t know what was going on, I was scared, it’s all Other Defendant’s  fault !” “I didn’t know my daddy”   “I can’t read!”  ” They closed midnight basketball”  “I was disenfranchised!”   “I was like Colin Ferguson!”, the subway ‘black rage’ nutcase killer of yore ,  “I didn’t get into the head start program” ” I was underprivileged” ….. “I wanted to be like Channon and Chris, but I knew I never would be, so if I couldn’t be them,  and have their lives, if  I could never be a kid like Chris,and  have a girl like Channon or be a girl like Channon and have a nice boyfriend like Chris that wasn’t a ghetto thug well- than neither could they! Kind of like  the old ‘If I can’t have you, no one can’, except racial-but like the obsessive stalkers- not only must they kill the objects of their jealousy ,desire , envy and yes-HATE- they must obiliterate them entirely, destroy them, disfigure them- make them suffer- and in the case of Channon Christian and Chris Newsom, they certainly did- destroying what they could never have, what they could never hope to be.

                                   To say it is a ‘Hate Crime’ is not only using the made-up lingo of people who apply that term ..well…liberally- but it is rather redundant in that MOST blacks feel some measure of hate – or at least resentment or bitterness towards Whites all the time. Yeah obviously I wish we never had slavery. I’m only second generation on one side,  none of my people were  not   even here, but do I carry around that lame Privilege Backpack guilt?  No. Do I feel I’ve reaped ‘rewards’ of slavery, whatever success or failures we have had a direct or indirect result of slavery? No.  I think slavery was awful and short-sighted, yes. Guilty, no. Do I think we (any Whites) deserve retroactive vengeance? No. We’ve been paying for it in various ways since, all of us. If we hadn’t done such a foolish thing as slavery, most likely I wouldn’t be writing this, and those kids would be alive. In the jungle one can hunt down just about anything and kill it with impunity- to have the genetic coding that allows one to take daily extreme risks and not pause a heartbeat is a good thing. In civilization- not so much. It’s not that hard to get that killing Whitey is not ultimately going to benefit them. Blacks should feel as horrified as we do about this terrible crime. Do we think they do? I don’t know. Most didn’t seem to be that upset over O.J. Most seemed to be happy when he got away with it, thinking it was some great leap for blackness that he/they got one over on Whitey.

                       The black violence question is not only rooted in poverty, or in -codeword – ‘Culture’, but could very well have its roots in a  genetic component, as is argued for lots of other things- from being gay to  doing a long-jump , to having savant-like skills  with numbers or music, to having health issues, to many, many very real things. Of course that is a ‘racist’ statement. It has to be ‘Racist!’ because the connection, if there a genetic prediliction towards anything- is part of DNA, and race IS part of DNA. It is NOT a social construct. When archeologists dig up bones, when forensic scientists can look at a skull and tell from whence that person came- that’s ot a ‘Social Construct’, is it?  NO, that’s Real- as Race is Real.

Back to the Death Penalty- there’s also the  problem of subsidizing their existence ,which we probably have been doing from birth to age 18 with state welfare, then from arrest onward- if this mayhem-enjoying gang does not get the death penalty, then I suppose every bank shooter, 7-11 killer, baby microwaver- they will  also skate because most crimes do not encompass all the horrors these kids endured – rape/sodomy/poison/immolation/suffocation/shooting/death. Don’t put US on trial, WE are not the ones who did this, defense  douchebags. Who the heck do you think you are? The onus is on YOU, not on us. Don’t cry about the internet, the last bastion of regular people who can post what they want and start whining about  about fairness and public trials when these kids’ families will grieve them forever. Who doesn’t wish they need not  live amongst savages such as these ?  You bet we want death for these scumbags  when we look at the videos of the parents with only balloons, teddy bears and scrapbooks- artifacts of their children’s lives to comfort them, when we see them having to go through public suffering- yeah I feel sorry for the PARENTS and family members, friends. The hell they must endure- missing and grieving their children and having to attend and sit in the same room with these vile creatures. These  poor kids just trying to live their lives, out on a date- never expecting the horrors that they would know in their last days, their last hours alive- you bet we want nothing less than death. We KNOW it is not Ed Gein or Ted Bundy we fear our kids will fall prey to- for every one of those that gets a book written about him by some would-be Clarice Starling- there are a hundredfold or more Letalvises…….and now we  see  articles saying the attorneys want us to stop? Will we stop?  Priorities, here- wait for just one damn minute  before sister Helen and the  candle-carrying brigade start crying for these sick &^%ks..

As I said, if we DON’T kill them, then what crimes DO merit the death penalty? In another blog posting, I addressed the ‘not a deterrent’  arguement:  It’s not about that, it’s not even completely about an eye for an eye, since they will float away on a fatal cocktail and their deaths will not approach the kind of cruelty they inflicted on Channon and Chris. What the Death Penalty does do, is make it very clear what will and will not be tolerated in Civilized Society. One of them, Boyd- got 18 years – but we know he will not do all of that- 18 years for two bright, promising, young lives. I wrote about that here https://silentconsort.wordpress.com/index.php?s=channon along with other posts about this case. We, as a society, cannot abide this kind of heinous crime, nor in an economy where people are losing their homes, jobs- can’t get affordable health care- we simply can’t afford to take care of murderers, give them the obligatory ‘three hots and a cot’, along with endless appeals and court appointed attorneys etc. Of course I know they will drag it out  but they won’t drag it out till they are 80-something years old. This legal system is crazy- speaking of 80-somethings, we spend money going after supposed ‘war criminals’ and extraditing them , while crimes like the Christian/Newsom murder continue on.  Have you heard about the Wichita Massacre? http://www.channonchristian.com/wichita123.pdf    Same deal, black on White crime, torture, rape, killing. One survived to tell the tale. As with Christian/Newsom, it was a family affair-  again, brothers in mayhem and murder.

Look at the majority of the comments at the end of the article: http://www.wbir.com/news/local/story.aspx?storyid=76477 . What is it the defense is so worried about people  reading that they don’t feel already, anyway? Is simply SEEING others that are justifiably enraged and disgusted too Real? What truths lie there that the defense is so worried about? What are they trying to hide that they fear might become known to prosepctive jurors? They wanted the interview/audios to come out that I linked to when I last wrote about this. Now they are saying they only want what THEY want to put out, and not for people to hear other regular people speak their mind. So, are we going to shut up and play nice- make the  attorneys happy through the remaining trials? I won’t and hope you won’t be afraid to either. Remember it is not only Our sites that need your help as far as posting, it is the news sites and message boards local to the case. I know some reading this gave quite a lot to this case. The parents might not be able to thank you, but because I look at us as all being part of a larger family- I thank you. Though it has been some time, it’s not over. People will be selected , people like those you might know who aren’t even political -will be called in, people who live there who may never have heard of this but for you and other WN.

Unlike the defense, we want them to know the truth- we want them to know how crimes such as these are hushed up by the media and happen more often than thought. If we actually believe in the things we claim to, we have to do the work. Embattled and embittered though we may be, we are obligated to take action  if we want people to believe we are not poseurs/raconteurs/internet bad-asses but can walk the talk and get results. You’re doing it for those kids who lie still in the ground and their families. You’re doing it to maybe save others from a similar fate. You’re doing it because you know you are part of something bigger than yourself and you can’t lie back and passively let it die without a fight.  For the Future – Yours, Mine and Our Children. Come on, there’s work to do. We did it before. We can do it again.

Other articles : http://news.google.com/news?hl=en&q=channon%20christian%20sites&um=1&ie=UTF-8&sa=N&tab=wn

 Bravo!

Bravo!

 

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/faith/article5799457.ece

Williamson to meet with Irving and Renouf in UK.

 

Even those who don’t identify as Christians/Catholics  will find  Williamson’s blog interesting.  He definitely shows he is a

Thinker
Thinker

 and though of course as a religious man operates from a place of faith- it is not blind faith.

Quotes from Williamson’s blog: http://dinoscopus.blogspot.com/ 

“For me, all that matters is the Truth Incarnate, “

 

Take me up and throw me into the sea; then the sea will quiet down for you; for I know it is because of me that this great tempest has come upon you.”   prophet Jonas, I, 12

 

On Crap  Culture:

“People are profoundly out-matched by this anti-culture. They do not stand a chance. They cannot listen any more. They can only believe what they see on television. They are despondent, but it is tough for anyone like me to go up against what is supposed to be “science” in the attention-deficit culture.”

 

On ‘9/11’

“These arguments and a mass of others are so strong that I can only conclude that true believers in the media version of 9/11 (which would exclude a multitude of pretend-believers) either have not looked at the evidence because they are satisfied with the truthfulness of their media and politicians, or the evidence is overpowered in their minds by a general belief in our governments and our way of life, or, worst of all, evidence is not what carries their minds. ”

Economic advice :

http://dinoscopus.blogspot.com/2007/12/storm-advice.html

On Roman satirist Juvenal, Nature  & Pagans :

“Firstly, grace is in line with the nature that God gave us, and does not come down, like on a parachute with a machine-gun, to get nature into line. When the pagan writer without grace can see so many spiritual truths from nature alone, it proves that nature and grace are aligned, even if grace is infinitely far above nature, and nature has no claim at all upon it. Too many Catholics see the grace of our religion as a kind of policeman with a truncheon to beat us into shape. Similarly law (good law) is a friend and not an enemy of nature!”

Winslet & Fiennes in The Reader

Winslet & Fiennes in The Reader

 Holocaust education groups are staging a last-ditch bid to stop Kate Winslet winning an Oscar for playing a Nazi concentration camp guard in The Reader. Mark Weitzman, head of Jewish human rights and Holocaust teaching organization The Simon Wiesenthal Centre, has slammed the film for its “revisionism”. 

He said: “Essentially it takes a woman who serves in, is responsible for, is complicit in, you pick the words, in the deaths of at least 300 Jews – and her big secret shame is that she’s illiterate.” 

http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/showbiz/film/article2257810.ece

~Looks as if Winslet will not make ‘Oskar’s List’, but she did get an Oscar nomination for her role in The Reader, in which she plays an illiterate Nazi guard who takes up with a young man who reads to her. Reads to her because she can’t read. The jews are up in arms because they consider The Reader to be one among many recent films protraying Nazis as sympathetic- flawed, human- and having painful secrets that might trump the Only Acceptable and All-Important Main Theme: victim jews, evil Nazis and that Nazis may never Suffer . Ever. Incapable.

 They are always in the power position, never show weakness,  are always Evil and Cruel. Always One Dimensional.  Anything that gets away from that Approved Schematic is verboten , dangerous-maybe even a threat . This is only one article that echoes the sentiments of many others, the heresy of showing any vulnerability and what is probably perceived as Official Neglect for not covering the  WW2 event  in any way except the obligatory fashion. Winslet’s character has more than one thing going- or not going- for her- and that’s the problem. ~~~

Scene from The Lives of Others

Scene from The Lives of Others

Recently saw  The Lives of Others, a dystopian drama in German with subtitles, revolving around the lives of a  writer and his actress lover, ( Sebastian Koch and Martina Gedeck) who are being monitored by the Stasi . An interesting twist , which is related to the theme in The Reader  but takes it a step further- is that the man sent to live in the flat above them, to bug  their apartment, spend hours listening to them and follow their movements- becomes sympathetic to them, and possibly to their cause, thus prompting ever-more plot twists-  While it is not officially based on a true story, wiki states that

 At the same time the screenplay was published by Suhrkamp Verlag, Donnersmarck and Ulrich Mühe were successfully sued for libel for an interview in which Mühe asserted that his former wife informed on him while they were East German citizens through the six years of their marriage-

http://www.sonyclassics.com/thelivesofothers/swf/index.html

 

 This is what many Whites think of themselvesVelveteen Rabbit- He hoped one day to be Real. White people believe they are like the rabbit in the story. Not Real. In the story, Realness is conveyed through a child’s love- and through wear and tear, suffering-but White People- we’re ALREADY Real.

 

 Internalization of the Endless Guilt Trip..

 Playing Pretend

 the  Invisible Filter That Shall Not Offend, the lame ‘Privilege Backpack’ that says whatever we have accomplished, whatever we are good at- well, it doesn’t really count- it only counts because it’s Our Structure that says it’s worth something- we ‘made-up’ our talents and worth- even though the Unspoken Truth says everyone else secretly agrees and  thinks what we’ve made, what we are – actually IS worth a hell of a lot.  Worth so much in fact, that it MUST be taken away, ruined, broken, burned-violated, mocked, killed, you name it.

At first it was just about ‘shaaaaaring’. Sounded nice to  some people – not so far away from the Golden Rule stuff. After that it wasn’t about sharing, now you have to  actually give stuff up completely, give it away, or have it taken from you or to accept horrible things forced upon you, compulsory associations.

 Another Meme for Whites: Smart= Evil

Another Meme for Whites: Smart= Evil

Whites, Europeans, whatever you want to call us, we’re always the Bad Guy, the Island Of Dr. Moreau Evil Scientist, the Great Oppressor of Everyone, Serial-Killer- when in actuality, we are always the ones everyone looks to Save The Day- we’re supposed to Save the World, yet believe at the same time, we’re supposed to believe we have no culture , we’re not Real.  Velveteen Rabbit again.

Once we believed we were Real, but now we walk around with ‘tribal tattoos’ , dreadlocks and piercings. Disaffected Youth has always been with us, but in the past, it was OK just to be a White Guy. Now, if we are not adopting a foreign orphan, or otherwise helping the third world, or advocating for same to come here, and protecting their ‘rights’, we are considered part of the Evil System, The Man keeping everyone down.

It’s a CONSPIRACIST !

  Same for the  ‘We are the world, we are the children’, ‘We’re all part of the Whole, We’re all One, we’re all in this together’ crap. Singing ducks and frogs on Sesame Street.  Not Real. We’re so not in this together.  I figured out in grade school  no one was just going to ‘play well with others’ just because they were told to, or because it was a swell idea. People want power. People go in and take over stuff.  Other people are not happy about it. Armies, protests- no one is playing any nicer because of someone being elected. Have we left Iraq?  Our economy is screwed. We’re being invaded by illegals, because their own place sucks, and now ours sucks too. Maybe if we keep up with this Fairness Crapula, it will suck even more. Nothing is Fair and Balanced. That sounds like a commercial for metamucil or a breakfast cereal.  Real life isn’t about equal and fair,  even when The All Poweful Extreme Liberal  White lobby says so.  At least the O said NO to the ‘Fairness Doctrine’ – Is Henry Waxman a Fairness Denier?

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/02/17/fairness-doctrine-used-police-internet/

The American Spectator reported Monday that Rep. Henry Waxman, D-Calif., is taking the call to a new level. The article said aides to the chairman of the House Energy and Commerce Committee met last week with Federal Communications Commission staff to discuss ways to not only enact those policies but give Waxman’s panel greater oversight over the Internet. 

The committee vigorously denied the report. A spokesperson called the account “fictitious” in a statement to FOX News. 
     They set  up the Premise, this False Dichotomy that thinking one is ‘ Better Than That’ than to even come near this kind of thinking BecauseNicePeopleJustDon’tDOThat- Better Than That- a phrase I used to hear all the time as a kid “Don’t do that , don’t wear that, etc- you’re Better Than That.”

 Now-  no one can be Better At or Better Than anything, or even ASPIRE to be better, because that implies someone else is in fact, well- worse. And that doesn’t play with the Reality Deniers.That’s not being a Team Player, the kind of team where you do all the work and everyone else looks at you for the answers because even if they can read, they sure as hell can’t think.   Olympics- are they physically superior? Why  yes, they are. Mensa? Are they IQ Supremacists? Maybe there’s all kinds of Supremacists out there that we haven’t even discovered! Maybe there’s Bum Supremacy, Drunk Supremacy, Welfare Supremacy!   Meanwhile let’s keep trying to stick to the ‘everyone is the same’ deal, which really means, we want mo’ dumber, we want ‘less good’. Just be <, so everyone can be The Same.  Nope, you’re STILL not  doing it right, you’re STILL being  > .

 It must be some testing-supremacy or the magical bad fairy sprinkled some Priviledge Dust on the tests that make it that some 88% of Mensans are White.  It’s The Man!  It’s the bogeyman. If you AREN’T looking at Reality and Living  in  ‘C’Mon Get Happy ‘  Partridge Family Diversity  Dreamworld , you must really suck. And you’re a redneck ! And you’re not as rich as us, or as smart as us, and doggone it, people hate you!  Problem is , ‘Get Happy’ committee- it ain’t that easy to ‘Get Happy’ , brother. Cause they’re ain’t much to get happy about.

 

Channons Mom, Deena Christian: shades of Channon, marred by pain

Channon's Mom, Deena Christian: shades of Channon, marred by pain

How the families can sit in the same room with the killers and not lose it , I don’t know. I suppose some would want to face the killer of their children, but it just seems like more torture and they could be spared some of this by a partition, where neither could see the other or a one-way mirror. To have to go through a long grieving period  probably without end- and multiple court trials and not have at least  privacy FROM these scumbags is horrible. If anyone was as sick as to do the things they did, they would have to be so sick they would  might get some satisfaction out of my suffering, my loved one’s suffering, the other set of parent’s , friends, etc.  I don’t know if this particular crew of sickos has the mental capacity for something even something not-so-pathologically-complex , but in the sense of not wanting to give them anything else, not even affording them the chance to look.

https://silentconsort.wordpress.com/2009/02/03/audio-hear-killer-of-christiannewsom/

http://www.volunteertv.com/home/headlines/38721042.html

 When you listen to the sound of the voice, you can HEAR the LIES. It’s not like when you are unfortunate enough to hear a fellow White lie, and you can tell they kinda don’t even believe it themselves- or they’re just batshit crazy- no-this is something else- like a little kid. You can hear the lack of frontal cortex activity, the lack of self-control, the lack of ability to compose oneself- the way this …..creature is so quick to blame the other ones-he doesn’t even know if what he is saying is helping or hurting him -the fear in his voice that there is no way in hell he is going to be able to keep up enough to come up with anything consistent, coherent or close to the truth.  The interviewer even tells him “look , we already know about this, OK?” Hearing the audio only solidifies the reality of what happened to Channon and Christopher. Do they want pity for the poor, rage-filled murderers like a good, privilege-backpack carrier should because maybe they have 10 half-brothers or their mom was on drugs? THAT is NOT  the point. The point IS Inherent Danger existing way, way before this happened.  

We cannot have a  free pass to commit murder and mayhem against our children-if we do that it does cheapen the lives of the victims. That is saying  Getting Away With It as Fake Reparations. Now, let’s  make distinctions here: stealing a steak to feed your kids is not the same as kidnapping, rape, sodomy, immolation, shooting, suffocation, making people drink Draino. Oh, and I guess we can include the daily  moms killing their kids as opposed to the EXCEPTIONS , which would be Susan Smith and Andrea Yates. – http://www.myfoxdc.com/dpp/news/021909_autopsy_results_missing_girl

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/ny_crime/2009/02/09/2009-02-09_voodoo_made_me_drown_kids_long_island_mo.html 

VOODOO made me do it, headline reads Can just see the ‘Cultural Defense ‘ posted about last week trying to worm itself into something that is probably some kind of Darwinian r-selected reproductive strategy. In bad economic times, or any time when stressed, get rid of the children!

Again, if we don’t think crimes like the Christian/Newsom case make death seem like the right thing to do- what does that say about us? Is this the far reaches of ‘Tolerance-land’, where we end up dead, but yeaahh , it’s OK , because we’re Better Than That. We’re Better Than The Death Penalty. Only -insert unpopular, villified, name-called politically safe-to-attack group type people believe in that ! People tend to fall  back on cliches- looking for some kind of Magic Yardstick to Measure their own Thought Process by- threads going on and on “Well is it ‘A society is judged by how it treats it’s animals, or is it criminals, or is it old people, or is it…. someone, help me know HOW to  get a fix on some automated process in my head! I’ve been messing with teh script all day and I keep getting these horrible error pop up messages, you don’t expect me to think all by myself , do you?”

http://forum.quoteland.com/1/OpenTopic?a=tpc&s=586192041&f=099191541&m=402106249

It’s all about How Much Crap We Take as a measure for How Good and Noble  we are.  It used to be : “Johnny, can you think of any reason why the kids are excluding you? Are you sure it isn’t anything you’re doing, or have done or not done- or are they just mean, rotten , hateful brats?”  Now the deal is,  “Johnny, are you sure you couldn’t have taken your shoes off and given them away BEFORE they hit you? Are you SURE you couldn’t have taken a litte more s&^% ? Susie, are you SURE you can’t give any more of your free time to saving those who wil victimize you, given half a chance?” Case I posted about last year- the Zachary Cataldo case- your 7 year old gets a skull fracture https://silentconsort.wordpress.com/2008/08/18/blame-thewhitevictim-7-yr-old-boy-gets-skull-fracture-at-oakland-elementary-school/

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/object/article?f=/c/a/2008/04/24/MNPC10AK04.DTL&o=   White  7 yr old gets attacked three times, ends up w/skull fracture at an Oakland school

Again, listen to  and contrast the angry, yet trying to keep it together tone of the first speaker ,with the  trying-so-hard-not-to-offend-so-I-don’t-lose-my-job tone of voice of some of the teacher/admins and then the callousness and unsympathetic and irresponsible. One parent advocates the use of a program that is after and before school care, knowing how savage it is that a child is not safe there, but not wanting to come out and say that, that’s not friendly  and positive. The next one says “the best place for children is at school”. If that is true for those kids, that is horrible and sad if school is a better place than home. “We have two play therapy rooms.” What does that say? Is that something to brag about, or is it a statement which confirms the bad behavior, as does the high suspension rate. “we want to know how to support these children..la, la la.”  When are you going to get that it’s too damn late!  

” The early indications definitively show that this person  is not a hapless victim (meaning the 7 yr old with the skull fracture) ” Troy Flint, district spokesperson, It’s premature to say, when the facts are still being resolved, that this person is purely a hapless victim.”  FAIL !  FAIL! FAIL!

So Flint, you still maintain the kid deserved it? You’re saying a SEVEN YEAR OLD had a SKULL FRACTURE  coming to him? ! YOU are the one who needs the therapy room, buddy, you are one sick mofo. 

(video 2, about 6 minutes in) http://cbs5.com/local/oakland.school.bullying.2.708749.html be sure to look beyond the first video, which is the feel-good, la-la stuff = keep programs in place, justify my job BS whether or not it works. After a minute, the video loads and you can fast forward/rewind.

In his book, Not Yet “Free at Last”, Mikel Holt writes in depth about school-choice and how many programs are ineffective ,the money goes mostly to the useless infrastructure- and specifically, White made-up jobs-  paper-pushing program directors and coordinators who ‘manage’ form afar.  His position, if not officially Nationalist, certainly agrees that self-determination cannot be ‘bestowed’ or ‘given’ by these redundant and non-effective programs. Why do you think it’s this way, Mikel? Besides the obvious of wanting some semblance of control, you know- not wanting constant rape and robbery- do you think it’s because we don’t trust you? Do you think it could be we are afraid? Do you think it is because we just don’t think y0u can do it? There ARE differences , like it or not- and yes, I agree with you that civilization was set up in order for the civilized to succeed, unimpeded by constant violence, noise, chaos, jumping around, etc. 

You DO  need your country back, pronto. I wouldn’t expect I could last 5 seconds in Africa-and that is why the Creator did not put me there. Most of us are born perfectly adapted to their environs they originate from-  pollution, suspect vaccines, allergies, obesity, pharmaceuticals, MTV and other dangerous pathogens notwithstanding. You actually might actually be better off taking over a ‘fresh start’ place like Africa than a place where Whites have all but blown the whole thing, and attached themselves to hated peoples simply for power or a toehold. 1) Ex-American Blacks wouldn’t be marginalized there, they would probably be looked up to. I mean, even our president isn’t really representative of most black americans. Come on, you know he’s not. I know he’s not.  I much prefer the Farrakhan/Rev Wright style of nationalism over the wimpy soy-latte kosher-conservative one.

 Should we Tolerate and have Compassion for those who would torture and kill our children? We simply cannot allow that to exist-hence Death Penalty. The Guilt Trip game is like Christmas Lights going around and around a tree. You’re the Tree . Once around the tree the lights say” hey, you haven’t led the same type of life as these murderers, therefore, feel bad for them, have mercy, they’re not like you, only they’re = to you, but then at the same time you’re not like them, eventhoughwe’reallthesame, celebrate diversity, though any differences are just a social construct”. The next go-round of lit-up , feel-good-and smarter-and better-than-thou cliches go something like “Ok, so they’re Evil, but does that give US the right to commit murder? If we do, that must mean  we’re evil too, and we then would have to tear up the ‘we’re better than that’ card .That is just faulty logic.

That’s  the card that we have been programmed to accept that says , the only way we can assert we are better is by Taking As Much Crap as We Can. Don’t leave home without it. We can’t just BE better inherently, because that goes against the We’re All God’s Chillun’  premise. That  LIE that states if everyone started off ‘equal’ – by environment, food, and of course schools, and socio-madeup la la la……POOF!  SAME!. But we KNOW that is CRAP.  Just sitting next to someone  code-word-for -White ‘Middle-Class’ doesn’t make one civilized. Doesn’t make one any smarter than they are. Moreover, if they are one of the many Backpackless, it could lead to your kid getting stabbed or shot by a mexican simply for hanging around a White kid.

False Acceptance Memes: Reality : you suck!  Yeah, well you suck my camels in Hell!

False Acceptance Memes: Reality : "you suck!" "Yeah, well you suck my camel."

 

 It’s part  of the whole This is the Same as That,when it isn’t -and never will be. This is not the same as That. If you’re going to be about this  Whee !Diversity! stuff- then accept a thing for what it really and truly is, not what you want to pretend it is.  You’re still YOU, nomatter how many times you re-make or re-do or re-decorate or plastic surgerize or gain/lose weight, you are still YOU, and they are still ..NOT you. Capisce?

 

Firebrand

If I were a man,
would I ask
Does she do it for love-
or just because she can?

If I were a man,
would strength be in my heart-
or in my hands?
How much can one withstand?

It goes to follow,
in Sleepy Hollow
Heads will roll.
A plane, umanned will crash-land
a mother’s ashen remnants of a soul.
Strange fits of passion-
unplanned.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Addendum:

There really is no  way to completely avoid the end of Jim’s story. However, I have been trying to make a compilation of the contributions he made – such as attending events and tirelessly publicizing the Channon Christian/Chris Newsom case, Robbie Hedrick case, breast-cancer walkathon, Toledo, and endless hours of radio time. If you have something you remember and would like to share, please leave a comment here or on any of the postings.

Being interested in language, grammar and word usage in general, I found this to be of interest-  those of you interested in theology might  as well-the below writings are taken from the various links provided. While the Greek language is often very straightforward, I realize there are subtleties that can make translating it no easy task- here it appears as if things originally quite direct and simple are changed by phrasings and either =/-  words- for what purpose I don’t have even Sunday school to fall back on, but  one has to wonder how and why the original meanings were changed and ask oneself who benefits? That said, in perusing these links, it was an education in how it  certainly appears much meaning was altered, and some things simply invented. Some of the articles give very specific examples of how wording can affect what ones takes away from a passage. Again, I’m certainly no theologian or bible scholar, but found it interesting nevertheless. 

 

ved 

http://books.google.com/books?id=ucfrVPvf9pkC&pg=PA924&dq=greek+semitisms&lr=#PPA924,M1

The meaning of certain words. Probably the most important kind of influence exerted by the Semitic languages on New Testament Greek is in the meaning of certain theological and ethical terms.

 It also contradicts the promotion of Hebrew as the only ‘acceptable’ language to God, and as the “language of heaven”.

Some speculate that the Jews did this “amazing” job of selectively editing multiple copies already in worldwide circulation. According to the Jews themselves, they “burned” all copies which they obtained. They didn’t want to just change the written names of God and Christ, they wanted to completely stamp out “Christianity”, the belief in Christ.

http://www.geocities.com/changes1611/name11.html

          If Matthew were considered primary to Mark, this would mean that the writer of Mark had intentionally made slight alterations in meaning to the Matthean text he copied/translated in order to cast the Jewish disciples and people in a bad light. Such a thought must have been intolerable to theologically committed scholars, and to others who wished to remain in good standing with their Christian colleagues and editors. It is still intolerable to some today, as evidenced by what one scholar said at a Society of Biblical Literature annual meeting, as reported by Daniel B. Wallace.24.1 This scholar confessed, “I cannot hold to Matthean priority because of Mark’s decidedly harder readings.”      The readings are “harder” only because it is hard for theologically committed scholars to believe that the writer of a gospel could have been pro-gentile and anti-Jewish.

http://www.tjresearch.info/priority.htm

http://www.tjresearch.info/mksec8.htm

The Greek outlook on religion and morals differed greatly from that of the Jews, and Greek terms were of course used to reflect the Greek outlook. But the Septuagint translators used these terms to represent Hebrew words which reflected Jewish meanings, and thus gave these Greek terms a new meaning. It is often this new meaning which attaches to these words when they are used in the New Testament.

One example is the Greek word nomos, which is usually translated “law.” In Greek the basic meaning of nomos is “custom” or “convention,” for the Greeks held that law was simply codified custom. But in the Septuagint the word is used as the equivalent of the Hebrew term torah, which means strictly “instruction” and which was applied to the Books of Moses, “the Law.” To the Hebrews, law meant not codified custom, but divine instruction imparted through Moses and his successors.  http://www.bible-researcher.com/hebraisms.html

Thus when the New Testament writers wished to speak of law, not in the sense of man’s convention, but in the sense of God’s revealed will, the noun nomos lay ready at hand. Much the same took place with regard to a number of words, including names and titles of divine beings, psychological terms, and words denoting such theological concepts as righteousness, mercy, sin, atonement, sacrifice, propitiation, and reconciliation.

Contrast in extreme terms.

    Contrast in Hebrew is often stated in extreme terms for the sake of emphasis. The words of Malachi 1:2-3, “I loved Jacob, but Esau I hated,” illustrate this feature of Hebrew speech. A New Testament example is the Lord’s solemn affirmation, “If anyone comes to me and does not hate his own father and mother and wife and children and brothers and sisters, yes, and his own life also, he cannot be my disciple.” (Luke 14:26). What Jesus means of course, is that his disciples must give all other objects of love second place in relation to him—a meaning brought out in the parallel passage in Matthew 10:37, “He who loves father or mother more than me is not worthy of me; and he who loves son or daughter more than me is not worthy of me.” Luke’s version preserves the Hebraic style, Matthew’s the Greek.

Various pleonasms, or ‘fillers.’.

 Hebrew often describes activity with a wealth of detail which the Greeks would find unnecessary, though perhaps colorful, as for example, “he arose and went,” “he lifted up his eyes and saw,” “he took and planted.” New Testament examples include Matthew 13:33, 13:46, 25:16, Luke 15:18, Acts 5:17. Frequently the verb archomai “I begin” is used pleonastically (see Mark 1:45, 5:17, 6:7), but it is not redundant in a passage like Acts 1:1 (Acts continues what Jesus literally began to do and teach.

More Sources :

http://www.etsjets.org/files/annual_programs/2008_ETS_Program_Schedule-Index.pdf  Semitisms in Greek and How to Detect. Them

http://www.bible-researcher.com/hebraisms.html

www.biblicalstudies.org.uk/pdf/semitisms_payne.pdf

 http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&lr=&cluster=10462669568675744904&um=1&ie=UTF-8&ei=MtCXSb7dO4HwsAPJ2P2AAQ&sa=X&oi=science_links&resnum=1&ct=sl

http://faculty.gordon.edu/hu/bi/Ted_Hildebrandt/New_Testament_Greek/Text/Moulton-CharateristicsOfGkNT-I-Exp.doc

 THE SEMITISMS OF ST. LUKE’S GOSPEL

H. F. D. SPARKS Right arrow Full Text (PDF)

http://jts.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/reprint/os-XLIV/175-176/129

Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt By Hildegard Temporini, Wolfgang Haase (most is in English online, despite title)

Just when you thought our legal system couldn’t possibly sink any lower…Ok so it’s not the legal system per se, it’s ALL of it, the Whole Thing- but types like this are trying to put about ideas that can only make things even worse. Check it out.

http://tinyurl.com/cupcvu

  Ummm, so your deal is convincing judges that sicko stuff should be considered ‘EEETZ my KulCHURE , man. Thatz just what wee DOO ”  and punishments lessened or dismissed . This is the kind of crap that makes me sick- Sure, we all have  problems, but after reading this stuff I’m feeling like maybe I’m not doing so badly after all. Alison Dundes Renteln, you just SUCK. If you’re not making sense and are wearing  everything that you secretly, repressedly believe turned  inside out-you just might be a diversity co-dependent– as opposed to a co-defendant, though you’re that too, since others are probably promoting the same garbage . You drank the Berkeley Kool-Aid, and opened your own lemonade stand in LA. Good for you. Bad for everyone else. 

“Cultural differences deserve to be considered in litigation because enculturation shapes individuals’ perceptions and influences their actions,” she writes in the book.

 She is calling for formal acceptance in the legal community of a cultural defense in which legal systems acknowledge “the influence of cultural imperatives” in illegal acts.>>

Wow, why didn’t anyone think of that before? That is awesome, Alison! Getting sex criminals off on some kind of ‘Diversity! Yay!’  defense. Tell us, when did this lightning rod of brilliance hit you? Were you watching the news? Were you enjoying a soy latte?  Or did the kids next door run through your flowerbed one too many times?  Will it be called  getting a CUI as opposed ot a DUI?  Cultural Imperative, huh?  How about Culturally Impaired? ‘My culture commanded me to do it’. Kind of like The Devil made me do it! I can’t help it, I’m (fill in the blank ethnic group). Kind of the opposite of those silly tourist shirts ‘Kiss me, I’m Irish/Greek/German/Whatever ‘, more like ‘I’ll kill/molest/stab/murder/steal your bike , I’m (fill in whatever race/people)!’ 

Cultural Imperative, huh? Almost sounds like if enough cases pile up using that, it could be construed as  RACIST!  What is the new made-up phrase? ‘Stereotype Threat’ ? Instead of the person being bad, or the race being bad, it’s Culture. And it’s not Bad, per se, right?  Because that would be making a Value Judgement and we just can’t do that-because that wouldn’t be Fair and Accepting- we can only  do that at to each other- never at some other group. Okey-dokey, I get it. It just Is What is Is, man.   Hate the sin, love the sinner.  Cool, I’ve got at least three ‘cultures’ I can call upon !  How far back can we go, Alison? Ancient times? Maybe you get a little punishment, a little tardo-counseling with worksheets and positive I-statements, but at the end of the day- no one goes to jail. Neat-0. Kind of like Assimilation meets ASlimeyNation, which you are helping shape. Have a gold star.

A judge in fact did consider the Albanian man’s culture in which touching a child has no sexual meaning and is an accepted form of affection and comfort. The man was acquitted of child sexual abuse although he did lose his parental rights. Renteln says such consideration should be the rule rather than the exception, and she also questions whether the interests of the family were served by separating the father from his child.>>

WHATWHATWHAT?!!!   EWWW . I would bet many people from other cultures would be offended at the suggestion such behavior is their cultural ‘norm’ and would not want that false assumption and legal manipulation to serve as a way for sickos to beat the rap for unnatural, criminal acts. Strike ONE . And,  Strike  TWO, if it IS true, that some ‘cultures’ AKA race/peoples/whatever DO these horrible things consistently, well then, let’s see- do we want to let them, defend them? Or Duhhh, look a little bit further, use your mental ZOOM OUT function-  do we WANT that HERE?! Strike THREE -you’re out. Your argument sucks, the whole Culture Defense idea sucks.

“Touching children in the genital area should probably be discouraged….

not only because parents will encounter difficulty with the law, but also because children caught between two cultures may feel uncomfortable if they realize it is considered inappropriate conduct in the larger society.**  But incarcerating parents or breaking up families are illegitimate means of inculcating new values,” she writes in “The Cultural Defense.”>>

Probably be discouraged” , huh?  Ugh.  I know, I  know. I’m guilty of Anti-Solicitorism, right?  I’m the  Hater because what YOU’RE suggesting is foul and wrong. So… you’re saying that yeahh, just keep the family together and believe that that OMG, no way!  The parents have never heard that molester stuff is NOT COOL in 99.9 of  EVERY culture ?  And on the rare occasion it might be, we should be TOLERANT  of it? WTF are you talking about?  Are you INSANE? Do it just to make a name for yourself?  You really had nothing better you could think up to write a book about?   Sick, sick sick.

The author is not, she emphasized in an interview with the Bar Journal, advocating leniency for all defendants whose culture may put them at odds with U.S. law. “I do think the courtroom door should be open to the consideration of culture. That doesn’t mean I think the argument should always prevail,” says the USC professor of political science and anthropology, who also has a law degree from USC and a Ph.D. in jurisprudence and social policy from UC Berkeley.>>

So.. you’re backpedaling to protect yourself from people calling you out like I’m doing?  Disclaimer much? And I’m the ‘Hater’ ? Hahahahaha

**” Dad, you mean in Amerika I’m not SUPPOSED to get molested?  Huh? But you’re not going to jail because it’s ok where we’re from. And me and mom and the brothers and sisters are supposed to be happy about that. Is that why that girl’s dad who drowned her in their backyard pool never went to jail, because of this ‘Cultural Defense’  stuff?  Ahh OK, I get it now. Uh. I think. Umm, Dad? Does this mean you are going to stop doing the creepy stuff now, or I have to just put up with it, because..well, nothing is going to happen to you really? 

culture Look up culture at Dictionary.com
1440, “the tilling of land,” from L. cultura, from pp. stem of colere “tend, guard, cultivate, till” (see cult). The figurative sense of “cultivation through education” is first attested 1510. Meaning “the intellectual side of civilization” is from 1805; that of “collective customs and achievements of a people” is from 1867. Slang culture vulture is from 1947. Culture shock first recorded 1940.

 ethnic Look up ethnic at Dictionary.com

c.1375, from Scottish, “heathen, pagan,” and having that sense first in Eng., from Gk. ta ethne, used in Septuagint translation to render Heb. goyim, pl. of goy “nation,” especially of non-Israelites, hence “Gentile nation.” Ta ethne is from Gk. ethnos “band of people living together, nation, people,” prop. “people of one’s own kind,” from PIE *swedh-no-, suffixed form of base *s(w)e- (see idiom). Sense of “peculiar to a race or nation” is 1851, return to the word’s original meaning; that of “different cultural groups” is 1935; and that of “racial, cultural or national minority group” is Amer.Eng. 1945. Ethnicity is from 1953; ethnic cleansing is from 1991.
imperative Look up imperative at Dictionary.com
1530, from L.L. imperativus “pertaining to a command,” from imperatus “commanded,” pp. of imperare “to command, to requisition,” from in- “in” + parare “beget, bear” (see pare).

(  a translation from Dante, regarding Paolo and Francesca)

One day, to pass the time away, we read
of Lancelot— how love had overcome him.
We were alone, and we suspected nothing.

And time and time again that reading led
our eyes to meet, and made our faces pale,
and yet one point alone defeated us.

When we had read how the desired smile
was kissed by one who was so true a lover,
this one, who never shall be parted from me,

while all his body trembled, kissed my mouth.
A Gallehault indeed, that book and he
who wrote it, too; that day we read no more.”

— Dante, InfernoV.82-142

Not having numerical advantage, part of our survival IS  DISCRIMINATION- and that word has more than one meaning- DUH. It means because we put a lot into our children, because in the act of not rampantly breeding since we hit our first menses, making all these decisiosn constantly about what could help our kids , what could hurt them, should we go to this school, should we not let them watch TV, are they reading enough, are they eating too little, too much, etc- this is ALL process of Discriminating. Discernment. It is part of our survival mechanism of searching out what is best for US, what is harmful to us. It involves a lot of frontal lobe activity and thought-process. If we shut down the ability to discriminate, if we fail to use our senses and back away from what looks like danger , and to magnetize towards what has the scent of  familar and good, if we fail  to  gather our resources and  use them in  altruistic ways  towards OUR OWN- we will surely DIE.

 \frac{dN}{dt} = rN \left(1 - \frac{N}{K}\right)

http://zebu.uoregon.edu/2004/es399/K.html

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/K-selected Why must the K-select  wreck the methodology Nature intended? See the article, see the little ‘r’ , that stands for species who have loads of offspring, like  spiders, or fish- but don’t invest a whole hell of a lot in them. Their survival as a species depends on this ‘just have  ’em and go to the club, no worries’ mentality. Some will  die, but some will live. Saving the extra caviar or turtle eggs doesn’t change the behavior of the ‘parenting’ or decision-making for the security of the children-or lack thereof, it just saves the caviar.  What do you think will happen to the K-selected offspring as we give our resources to the don’t-cares, knowing theu have the numerical advantage, though they might not have 99% of  what we have?  I’ll tell you what will happen- they will devour us, they will kill us, they will take whatever we have sacrificed and suffered for, and consume in in a feeding frenzy and then carry on their ‘r’ ways, as they always have, as they always will, no matter what we build them, how we try to help them, they are going to stick to the ‘r’ mentality.

Is it some weird pathology unique to rich, hollywood people- that they inwardly feel that maybe they actually don’t deserve all the millions so in order to assuage that guilt , they hav to do crazy and dangerous things like this, and then tell stories about relatives that did something similar, only not in Africa. Theyget on there and narrate their on liberal, PC version of Reality Show National Geographic , where White people can get out from behind the camera! Jane Goodall, look out!  At least  other hollywood Official Good Liberal Guy people are  passing out condoms in Oakland, like Bono. Now that actually might have some pay off, though he could get ambitious and afford to offer big reparation/sterlilization payouts himself or do matching donations.

If they were serious about their delusional, misguided and impossible task of saving the world, they would do without their 10K dresses, Manolo Blahniks, drivers, cooks,nanny, palaces, etc. Like that’s going to happen.  This kind of thing really doesn’t ‘save’ anyone, because there IS no saving whole continents from such inevitable destruction- rampant breeding, no food, disease, no concept of civilization, no written language of their own, and so on. You think those africans are like “wow Salma, you’re like Mother Teresa, you’re like Gandi, Ferris Bueller, you’re my hero!”  and Maybe she should become friends with the wannabe-Jolie-octo-mom.

I watch so little TV/movies I’m not even familar with anything she has been, and after this really don’t want to watch anything she participates in-  but even if she is nuts, I  hope she doesn’t catch AIDS doing crazy stuff like this. No doubt this was provoked by the Hollywood-Cabal/Kaballah/We-Are-The-World yet at the same time, Look at me, I’m Sandra Dee, it’s all about ME and my earth-mama heroic boobs.  Why have your cake and eat it too, when you can BE the cake? I bet the father of her real baby probably wants to put her on medication and read her the riot act for  risking her own life, as well as that of her own child should she become infected, and maybe his as well.  I know a mother can pass on  diseases like aids nursing but I am not completely sure if it works the other way around- in any case , it is NOT worth the risk. She could have brought a ton of milk with her that wasn’t her own. You don’t just decide, if you are a mother- oh, I think I’ll head out to some totally dangerous place, and suckle some baby who may or may not be  HIV +. What was she thinking?  How could he even allow her to go to a horrific, dangerous place like that, bodyguards or no- and where is her real baby?

Lets all say the Pledge of Allegiance ~ Kevorkian

"Let's all say the Pledge of Allegiance" ~ Kevorkian

” The display was greeted with a mixture of applause and boos.”

 http://www.opednews.com/articles/Kevorkian-The-Right-to-Di-by-Rady-Ananda-090208-69.html

Kevorkian displays USA/Nazi flag

Kevorkian displays USA/Nazi flag

It would appear the  DIY death  eases suffering, gives one power over one’s own decisions regarding life/death, power over the decision of what is ‘quality of life’  and probably- as crass as this may sound, but in the world of an illegal anchor baby born every millisecond shutting down our ERs and medical institutions, it probably saves hospitals and families money as well as protracted grief. Recently I watched a family member pass , and to be totally straight with you, I vacillated between guilt and anger – wishing old Jack were around because although they say “oh they aren’t in any pain, they would let you know,” how is someone going in and out of consciousness with  old -age dementia going to let you know anything? 

It was maddening, yet at the same time, I felt like I was privvy to something sacred, as cliche and cheesy as that may sound . Still, that didn’t take away from the fact it seemed nature was prolonging the inevitable and was downright cruel at times.  I would sit there as the nurses could occasionally come and  poke and prod and turn and try to give water and my relative would say “Leave me alone, I’m trying to die.” It had been a few years since my family member had said much of anything that made sense or recognized me, yet towards the last days and weeks, some of that would came back, at least in parts. The priest and I had a discussion about this, saying this is not uncommon.

So it would appear the rules of the game in Old Age death at least- they pretty much give you drugs if you’re lucky- that speeds things along a nurse told me, and let you starve to death, however long it takes. I found out at least in our neck of the woods,  this thing called ‘hospice’  only amounted to a couple visits a week if , and they don’t do a heck of a lot- it was hard enough to even get them to call back. We were lucky enough to have a very good Orthodox priest to do what has a different name but amounts to last rites/funeral rites.

In studying other cultures, Asian cultures in particular-  they don’t seem to have the Old People Problem that Americans seem to have. They revere and actually want to help take care of their elders.

http://www.lewrockwell.com/rogers/rogers200.html

 I suppose  Kevorkian’s point was trying to say that we should have the right to off ourselves orrrrrrrr else-we’re-like-the-Nazis-who-won’t-let-us-do-anything because anyone who says No is for certain mean and probably a Nazi too..but… um.. wait.  That doesn’t make sense. Wouldn’t Nazis have been more than OK with the good Dr. and probably help him with his cause?  Yeah, I think they would, if the person wanted it.  His  swazi-flag doesn’t make his point.

Example, the case of Ramon Sampedro- in researching his story, I came upon sites/blogs of  disabled people (or advocates for) that resented the movie, though I found it beautiful . Of course it was not represnetative of how many disabled people feel about life, quality of life, and death- but are most movies accurate representations of anyone’s life? I certainly didn’t take the movie to mean that his wishes were representative of all or most disabled people. In fact, I thought that although Sampedro chose to die, and suceeded, that the majority of the film was quite life-affirming and at the least gave the non-disabled a chance to  look at what we take for granted, as well as gaining a different perspective that was far and away from most repugnant shallow ‘date movies’ constantly marketed towards us, about people that are nothing like us, the Sea movie showed the many complexities that stem from out own ‘infirmities’ whether they be physical, emotional or whatever, and in his case, his great inner capacity for humor, warmth, intelligence, and yes, intimacy were  just not enough.

 https://silentconsort.wordpress.com/2008/07/19/movie-the-sea-inside/

Most people don’t enjoy suffering, and especially don’t enjoy seeing someone they love suffer but they do  align themselves with various causes bcause that cause was adopted by their larger social/political/religio group. They take ‘Right to Life’  and think it’s linguistic opposite must be horrible and even if it’s not  some evil plot to make organ donors out of anyone who listens to REO Speedwagon, it could lead to anyone  being exterminated rather than being cared for. 

I think what people are missing here is that hospitals are going to be inept and give substandard care period, and let people die, not give them antiobotics after major surgery,make it hell just to get an appointment even for regular clinic stuff that isn’t life or death and that so many people still can’t afford health care and companies like wal-mart are telling their employees, hey ifyou’re still so poor working here you can’t pay into our plan, (that makes it not even worth it to work for such low wages to start with) get on the state welfare/medicaid deal. YeahI feel the disabled geta raw deal, but rest assured the non-disabled are getting sub-standard care from this overtaxed medical system. ‘Cared for’, whatever that means in today’s world of health care .

Case in point-In the last year, two people I know that are not elderly have had surgery, both  insured, both were not given antibiotics after the initial surgery – and both contracted staph infections and had to have further surgery because of the infection and stuff attached to them for two months. Why aren’t they getting the antiobiotics after the inital surgery like they used to do? Is it because of all these weird drug resistant strains being brought in- likestaph and  multi-drug-resistant-tuberculosis?  Sure I can see not wanting to dispense antiobiotics for evey cough and cold that comes down the pike, but not giving them to people who have just had major surgery as a regular precaution seems to harken back to the bad old days where people thought -and for good reason-living with ailments might be safer than seeking medical help-

 Children attending day care centers  from cities located in the north and south of Mexico showed higher prevalence than children from DCCs in the central region; 1.75%, and 1.71 vs. 0.08%, respectively (P < 0.05). 

  That last  .05  means it is statistically significant. Hmm, you think any of those from the north end have made it to the USA. With our crappy border control, I’d have to say yes. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19178880?dopt=Abstract

http://www.newswithviews.com/Wooldridge/frosty65.htm

People get so wrapped up in the for or against debate and hurling invectives , extreme scenarios at each other to try to win the debate that they miss where the problems originate and just want something simple to be for or against, even if that only  being against people who have a real logical argument. 

We’ve got 93 year old citizens freezing to death indoors in Michigan , because the electric or gas company  put some kind of limiting device  on his heat as he was behind on his payments- http://www.connectmidmichigan.com/news/news_story.aspx?id=251524

http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2009/01/29/marvin-schur/

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marvin_Schur

Schur, 93, left his entire estate – reportedly worth about $600,000 – to Bay Regional Medical Center-“I think he was attempting to pay, but his phone was shut off. He had his bills on the table and cash paper-clipped to it, from what I heard, but he literally had no way to connect with the outside world.

http://www.mlive.com/news/bay-city/index.ssf/2009/02/bay_city_man_who_froze_left_60.html

The outside temperature ranged from a high of 12 degrees to a low of minus 9 on Jan. 15, the day he was believed to have died. A heating pad was on his favorite armchair by the window. The oven door was open, perhaps to heat the place. http://www.transformhouston.com/archive/marvin-schur-wwii-veteran.php

and then we have  a mother with 6 kids going to fertility clinics to add 8 more becoming a cause celebre:

She is getting the media hype, but she is not the first- the other group got a free 6 bedroom house from Fannie Mae http://timepassonline.blogspot.com/2009/01/nkem-chukwu-and-iyke-louis-udobi.html

The Chukwu / Uwobi family moved to a new 5,200 square-foot home in League City, Texas, in September 1999, which was donated to them by the Fannie Mae Mortgage Company. The house has six bedrooms and is located on a cul-de-sac in a quiet area about 15 minutes from the hospital where the octuplets were born.

and then we go into the far reaches of what is termed ‘bio-ethics’, such as

Why grant apes rights? On this episode of What It Means to Be Human, Discovery Institute senior fellow Wesley J. Smith exposes the radical Great Ape Project, which seeks a UN declaration welcoming apes into “a community of equals” with humans. The point is not animal welfare, but to break the species barrier and destroy the unique status of humanity, completely transforming Western civilization. What could the Great Ape Project, championed by infanticide proponent Peter Singer and anti-religious crusader Richard Dawkins, hope to accomplish? Listen in and find out.

 

 

http://bravenewbioethics.podomatic.com/enclosure/2008-12-09T12_03_07-08_00.mp3 audio

“Nature Rights”  “Plant Rights” and the Defense of Human Exceptionalism

In this installment of BNB, Wesley J. Smith discusses the ongoing assault on human exceptionalism. Exceptionalism holds that human life is intrinsically unique and valuable, different from life as experienced by other organisms. Rising to challenge this idea is an array of figures including philosophers, academics, environmentalists, and materialists. Such people seek to erode any separation between humans and other species, and wipe away the idea that humans are beings with a soul. Smith warns that this trend could eradicate any foundation for human rights, and even pave the road toward classification of humans based on superiority and fitness. http://bravenewbioethics.podomatic.com/enclosure/2007-07-17T16_31_43-07_00.mp3 audio

For more : http://bravenewbioethics.podomatic.com/?p=1

The Enemy: Making an INdifference

An excerpt from The Little Red Schoolbook,1971

An excerpt from The Little Red Schoolbook,1971

http://www.milesago.com/press/lrs.htm

http://www.pdf-search-engine.com/the-little-red-schoolbook-pdf.html I could not find the aforementioned book in its entirety, but there are other interesting titles at the above link.

http://jb_speechification.s3.amazonaws.com/Little-Red-Schoolbook.mp3

Audio commentary above.

“Nearly all the changes in which you’re allowed to participate are in things which aren’t very important. The real and difficult changes are those which give more and more people power to decide more and more things for themselves”– from The Little Red School Book by Soren Hansen and Jesper Jenson.
Translated from Danish by Berit Thornberry. First published in London by Stage 1, 1971

At one time I might have believed the above lie, a logical fallacy, commie-influenced- that waa waa, we can’t do anything on our own, this crap directed towards kids that “you’re only allowed to participate in things that aren’t important”. They try to make these kids feel ‘oppressed’ by , at least at that time whe the world was not completely screwed up and turned inside out as it is now, that without utter rejection of society, and some collective Mao-ist  groupthink-but-wrapped-in-teen-rebellion-speak-one was basically nothing and had no influence. Even some adults believe they can’t do anything on their own without someone holding a meeting and giving them asignments. Not so.   

Girls that Dont Play with Bratz Dolls

Girls that Don’t Play with Bratz Dolls

 and ones that do:

 

Dante’s Inferno: Bratz Bday Party- WWBWD (What Would Bishop Williamson Do? One thing for sure, he wouldn’t be supporting this.)

 http://www.laurieleigha.com/LizzieBday2004.htm

In case you are lucky enough not to know about bratz and still want to, see here  https://silentconsort.wordpress.com/2008/07/19/bratz-custody-battle-larian-vs-mattel-vs-bryant/

Subverting the Subverters of our Youth: The Anti-Venom

 Earlier tonight I had the experience of a young man coming up to me that recognized me from a local event I had attended at least 2 years ago, who said I commented on the fact he and his friends were not wearing the clothing made popular by MTV , the ‘gangsta-wigger’ look, and how my talking to him and praising them for this fact affected him . He surprised me when he showed me he had marked himself with what looked like a homemade tattoo of a small symbol, and the mention of the word ‘Aryan’  . I was not in a place where I could address this with him, but he is always around and I am sure I will get another chance to discuss that with him further. He had been in some trouble with the law , had told me years ago he had quit drugs- meth to be specific and was now in the process of cleaning up his act. I had checked on him recently but I do this so often with various youth that I didn’t remember the event he brought up , but from things he said- he couldn’t have known these things otherwise, it had to be true.

 I have both praised those kids whom, at least by appearances, have not bought into the DysKulture of today and criticized- gently- always while pointing out something positive about them:

“This may sound totally weird, but  I just wanted to say you girls look really nice. None of you have that Jerry Spinger trashy look. Your parents must have done something right. I just want to thank you for not participating in the destruction of our culture. ”

Uncontrived, modest beauty

Uncontrived, simple beauty

  This  compliments them, points out a source of something to avoid which easily connects the dots to other things they should avoid,shows approval,  and perhaps most importantly-gives them pride in where they came from and how they deserve better than to emulate crap TV, to accept and be proud of who they are rather than affect the dress, speech and mannerisms of others unlike themselves..a man might say “I can’t stand that ‘tramp-stamp’ stuff. It’s really nice to see girls that don’t look like a joke. You girls look intelligent and classy, etc., etc.”

clean cut, healthy-Not a creepy wigger-thug wannabe

normal, clean cut, healthy-

Or…a compliment and criticism-one has to say this with true warmth, not harshness or derision-a man might take a different approach than I would but here is an example- “I can’t understand why you want to dress like that. You’re such a perfect representation of your type, but  this (gesture to offending clothes) just takes away from it- makes me look at the pants falling off -it’s just a distraction from your  great facial structure (or fill in whatever seems most apropriate or best feature). I can totally see how you would look in a nice shirt and pants “. Then smile and sigh. Or sigh and smile. This stokes their male ego and gives them something to aspire to-  the complimentary part will stick in their mind, and like all peacocks- they want to display themselves to their best advantage.

Or..”Your children are so beautiful.  Look at those bright eyes!  Don’t ever say you’re “just a mom”, your job is so important. Probably the most important. I’m glad you didn’t wait forever to have your kids. You get to be young with them, and have more time with them while you have the energy, youth and patience , besides the fact you will have more of your own life with them -You may even get to see your grandchildren grow up- though some think stalling till the last minute preserves their ‘fun, me,me,me’ longer, in actuality if you have your kids younger, you can do all the other stuff later, when you actually know who you are and what you’re interested in- Having kids does limit your ‘alone time’ but in that , you learn what it is you really love to do, and value your free-time more, rather than skip around doing a lot of nothing-and contrary to popular propaganda, you really can still read books and do other things -kids NEED to play by themselves and to figure out how to entertain themselves, explore stuff and be Ok without a ‘guided activity’ every second. If they don’t get this while young, they will grow up into kids and teens that have no interests and no imagination other than TV, videogames ,shopping trips, whining about how they are bored all the time, and other activities than require someone leading them every second.                                  

When you speak to the youth, show warmth, be polite and sincere. Most adults don’t bother or are afraid to approach them. Don’t be. When they reach out to shake your hand first, and introduce themselves, and wave to you days later as a different youth did after I gave him the clothes speech mixed with anti-drug last weekend- and their friend acompanying them actually starts defending himself and saying “I don’t do that stuff, look how I’m dressed, I don’t do drugs! “, it is so very worth it. It is stunningly clear these kids want and appreciate an adult taking an interest in them.

While viewing the you tube video, notice how they perpetuate the idea that if you don’t like this kind of crap foisted off on your children- well then, you must be pro-censorship (insert hysterical label !!! for emphasis EvilNaziRacistHater!!!). Of course this Little Red School Book was full of things that are now standard in most schools: abortion, homosexuality, and so on, and also contained many messages about how to subvert your parents and teachers, most of whom-at least THEN, were against this kind of thing, as the video illustrates showing parents repeatedly saying they DON’T want their kids exposed to this crap. It is interesting to note the contrast of  present day, where both teacher and parents would fully be on board with all of it with the parents and teachers in the video from that time period, whom the directors are trying their best to portray as Uptight Squares. Only now it isn’t about censorship, as no one cares about that, and no one also seems to care about what kids watch on TV, or who they fraternize with-

There is much to criticize about this particular modus operandi of infiltration of the minds of the youth-in this case it was part of Culture Destroying, but the same methods can be utilized to subvert today’s brand of subversion.  

Today’s youth, judging from the positive responses like the one I received tonight, among others -convince me that 1) face to face activism works 2) these kids are largely ignored and/or their parents do not find it important either to dissuade their children from this kind of self-degradation, or the parents simply do not think it is important or meaningful 3) these kids, usually teens -early 20’s are actually longing for a mentor/parental type figure to care about what they are doing. Many of them seem not to have parents at all from the way they seem to behave. Of course some may laugh at the moment, some may seem not to care, some may initially look at you strangely, and some may be beyond the point of being able to have an effect, but some, like the young man tonight- may remember and come up to you years later and thank you.  It’s not the ‘Making a Difference’ meme, it’s the  UNmaking of INdifference. In your caring for them, they in turn care about themselves, individually and collectively.
Yet another third world woman/baby-killing useless eater

Yet another third world woman/baby-killing useless eater

Sara Kuszak,pregnant , throat slashed in Puerto Rico

Sara Kuszak,pregnant , throat slashed in Puerto Rico

Don’t think it’s just THERE, somewhere ELSE, if you missed the last post. Anyone 2 + 2?  How Evil do people have to BE? Is it a contest?  So that snuffs out two decent non-murderous lives- one some woman thinking she’s on vacation or whatever she was doing there, and her baby. I think I will start a new category: Atrocities

atrocity Look up atrocity at Dictionary.com
1534, from L. atrocitatem (nom. atrocitas) “cruelty,” noun of quality from atrox “fierce, cruel, frightful,” from PIE *atro-ek-, from base *ater- “fire” + *okw- “see,” thus “of fiery or threatening appearance.” The noun meaning “an atrocious deed” is from 1793.

http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5iL3Azk9OxlT5JN3IbHzKrIj1swDQD965N7PO0
Video and more pictures of murdered woman here:

http://www.abcnews.go.com/US/story?id=6812483&page=1

Pregnant U.S. Tourist Killed in Puerto Rico

Sara Kuszak, an American tourist on vacation in Puerto Rico, was abducted by native Eliezer Marquez Navedo. Navedo ambushed Kuszak while she jogged in the coastal town of Fajardo, forcing her into the trunk of his car.

Kuszak tried getting help by making a call with her mobile phone while in the trunk. Her corpse was found a hour later with her throat slit. The FBI helped to locate the blood-covered suspect by tracing her cell phone.

Navedo confessed to the crime and will face charges of rape, kidnapping and first-degree murder. It was later revealed that *****Navedo’s mother Ines had slit the throats of two young children in a similar fashion in 1992. *****

http://www.shortnews.com/start.cfm?id=76815
Teen lured to Puerto Rico through X-box

http://www.abcnews.go.com/GMA/Parenting/story?id=6802149&page=1

“I don’t know what he could have told her to make her not say nothing, you know what I mean, but she didn’t,” Cobbins said.That’s not what he told Still. “Did you hear her screaming or anything?” Still asked.

“Weeping,” Cobbins answered. “She was saying, ‘No, no, don’t do that, no, don’t do that.’ “

Cobbins admits he was at the scene of the carjacking but insists it was Davidson and Boyd, who has not been charged in the carjacking or slayings, who carried out the crime.

http://www.knoxnews.com/news/2009/jan/31/lawyers-want-interviews-out/

Cobbins Interview with Knox Sheriff pt 4 AUDIO: Cobbins Interview with Lebanon (KY) Police

http://www.volunteertv.com/home/headlines/38721042.html  Cobbins, Davidson motion hearing  AUDIO: Cobbins Interview with Knox Sheriff pt 1AUDIO: Cobbins Interview with Knox Sheriff pt 2AUDIO: Cobbins Interview with Knox Sheriff pt 3AUDIO: Cobbins Interview with Knox Sheriff pt 4AUDIO: Cobbins Interview with Lebanon (KY) Police

Cobbins_Knox_01-11-07-1421
Cobbins_Knox_1-11-07-1539
Cobbins_Lebanon_01-11-07-1713

These are rather long, about  30 min each. Hear this POS lie and cry, and actually believe his BS will fly. It’s like he is too dumb to even connect the dots to what the cops already have established as fact and work from that. The cops talk to him like he is slow.  Cobbins breaks down crying. He  gets animated, he flips out at certain points.  Awww ,the poor rapist, murderer, immolator, torturer, sodomizer, poisoner, thief – you name it.He’s so scared, he’s so disenfranchised- everyone is out to get him.

My heart does not bleed for this guy, or any of them. Just because someone is pathetic doesn’t mean you are obliged towards pity or mercy. Cops are trying to get him to roll over on one or more of the other suspects,as if he is an innocent bystander.”I ain’t gonna lose my life for nobody!”   A lot of it is unintelligible. What makes me worry about the above quote  is that if the cops/lawyers might not think they can get the death penalty for all of them-why the cops are trying to get this one to rat out the other one. I’m not hearing remorse. I’m not hearing shame. I’m hearing someone afraid and angry with their back against the wall, who knows he is outsmarted and outgunned and all concerned know that he was involved with the rest of them.  I’ve written about this case a few times here, most recently

https://silentconsort.wordpress.com/2008/10/15/boyd-gets-max-18-yrs-for-accessory-to-christian-newsom-murders/

 I only regret that killing them is the worst they can do. That’s  like putting neosporin on skin cancer.

More google news results :
http://news.google.com/news?q=channon%20christian&hl=en&um=1&ie=UTF-8&sa=N&tab=wn

 They don’t deserve the trials to be moved. It doesn’t matter with crimes as  heinous as these. When the prosecution presents the evidence-and the jury hears the details of what they did-and no doubt they will hear from the coroner- one would tend to think even the most ‘saintly anti-death penalty’  people would have to ask themselves  if the sickest, most violent truly deserve to share this earth with the rest of us-and if so, what does that say about the value of life? Is it only Ok to be against torture when some groups do it, say in the name of war? Oh, it’s such a shameful thing. Torture is awful.  Women getting raped and mutilated  in (insert third world country), same thing- a cause worth a bumpersticker like Tibet?  But rape and torture and murder of our own children?  Well, that’s just Hateful. That was just an accident, like a three year old breaking a vase, we’re just making way too much of this.  Do you see the incongruity here? 

Many of us know about what this guy Pitts said, but it bears repeating, so that the unsympathetic vitriol  can be seen under the  red transparency film , like those spy books you could get from scholastic as a kid. You place the transparency over what you think you see, the obligatory disclaimer of “If they did it , I hope they rot” and you see underneath “You people have it coming, F U and the horse you rode in on.”  It’s not cute or clever to be snide, mocking and self-righteous about ‘racists!’ when at least 4 of your own committed such atrocities. It’s inappropriate and disingenuous to use a crime of this proportion as a springboard to go after people who are not Reality Deniers, like himself.

 It always amazes me when white people put on the victim hat.  And here I’m obligated, because I’m black, to say that if the defendants in this case did what they are accused of doing, I’d be happy to see them rot under the jailhouse. Sadly, that needs saying because there are people who will not take it as a given. But with that obligation fulfilled, let me add that I am likewise unkindly disposed toward the crackpots, incendiaries and flat-out racists who have chosen this tragedy upon which to take an obscene and ludicrous stand. I have four words for them and any other white Americans who feel themselves similarly victimized.http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/opinion/2003731134_pitts03.html

   I’m not the only one who was offended- here’s one comment, among many others out there:

 ” When a Pulitzer Prize winner adds the inclusive “AND” and then tags “any other white Americans that feel themselves similarly victimized” along with it, he is including exactly that, any other white Americans.   “http://www.newsnet14.com/2007/06/leonard-pitts-you-need-to-apologize-just-like-don-imus/

How much do you want to bet he thinks the Duke Rape Lie was a real hoot ?

https://silentconsort.wordpress.com/2008/10/05/revisiting-the-duke-university-rape-farce/

      There’s  the school of Golden Rule-itis- the syndrome where people forget that ‘rule’  exists making the assumption that most people are not going to kidnap and rape, torture and kill, that most people will at some point do things they aren’t proud of, but it is important to make distinctions between petit mal evil and grand mal.  They might think to themselves “two wrongs don’t make a right. ” Again, that kind of thinking is applicable towards the majority in the continuum of Bad Acts. They might say to themselves “I can’t save those kids now, it’s too late. Who am I to take another life to remedy their deaths with others?  I don’t want that responsibility, I don’t want that on my conscience. ”

         Again, that  2 wrongs/golden rule stuff  is living in the ether of  Everyone is Basically Good. There’s no such thing as Evil People, only disadvantaged. One can’t carry that PC mumbo-jumbo  in one’s proverbial Privilege Backpack along with the Wow-Maybe-Some-People-Really-Are-More-Impulsive,Violent,Dangerous-and-Much-More-Likely-T0-Kill-Your-Children-Than-Others . Too heavy a burden for anyone.

These conflicting theories separate like oil and water, destroy critical thinking skills- one’s sense of logic and reason and create that ever-present and troublesome sense of cognitive dissonance- The one sense of This thing is Real, and feels Right. I know in my heart it’s True.  This other thing- welll…. this Other Thing is only right  in the rare exception to the rule, and wrong the other 99% of the time, but-dammit I-want-to-keep-my-job-and-not-piss-people-off-and-not-be-called-names. Man, this sucks. It really, really sucks. I know it’s crap, just like all the other bad stufff that goes with this is crap. If  I start caring too much, with all this stuff in my head, I’m going to lose it.

How can one maintain the two conflicting beliefs without slipping into some catatonic-thorazine-like zombie state- a  limbo where we just want to light candles and Think Good Thoughts.  Positive affirmations. Vigils. Balloons. Teddy Bears tied to fences.  Roadside memorials.  The World of I’ll-Be-So-Good-and-Noble-in-the-face-of-Total-Evil-That-in-This-Goodness-I-can-Defeat-It!  I can. I can defeat all forms of Mean, whatever Mean means. Can we fix it?  Yes, we can, says Bob the Builder.  Watch the Superbowl, drink beer, think about celebrities and materialistic pursuits. Be self-absorbed under the guise of Good-Guy Approval Sticker. Because you’re worth it.

Everyone’s a superhero.
Everyone’s a Captain Kirk.
With orders to identify.
To clarify and classify.

                                             Nena, 99 Red Balloons

Someone else has done Evil, yet we can’t accept it. We need to make them Officially Sick. We need to come up with excuses, like …it’s all because their mom was a 12 year old crack addict. If they only had a Dad and a playstation, they wouldn’t have done this! They should have gotten more.. whatever. We’re  busy scrapbooking, hugging, holding  hands and crying. Oh, isn’t it terrible, as if it happened in a vacuum, all by its lonesome, the obligatory ‘isolated event’. Let’s just focus on Positive Memories and take Prozac. Awesome.

 We hear litany after litany:  “it was a  car-jacking  gone wrong”, “It could have been anyone they picked. It wasn’t racial, of course not, how dare ou suggest such!”  or “they were on drugs, otherwise it never would have happened” and try to convince ourselves it’s true. Chalk it up to Random Badness, which of course since we are all =, we are all capable of such, right? We all know someone who sets kids on fire, sodomizes them, tortures and kills them, don’t we? Hmm, let me check.. Nooo, there’s a lot of other random and sometimes dumb things people do, but ya know, those things-can’t say as I do know ayone like that. Must be because they got away with  it, because we’re all the same, but the ones who do it all the time in secret get away with it becauuuseee…” I know, I know , Mr. Kotter!  Because they’re Privileged! It’s that Magical Backpack Thing!  Right?  I bet the guy next door did this last weekend and the cops probably even saw him doing it and helped him escape!  ”

 We try to justify the fact that past history often predicts future events any way we can. If someone fake-challenges us with “well, it is obvious from their past criminal record they had troubled lives” , “it’s Black Rage, like that Colin Ferguson kook on the subway. They didn’t really know what they were doing. Oh, I didn’t mean they are slow, of course they are geniuses, we’re all the same- don’t get me wrong, they could have been rocket scientists and cured cancer If Only They Had a Dad (meme) but they were compromised, they were ‘at-risk’ …. um.. in the throes of blinding rage against The Man. It’s really The Man’s Fault. It’s always The Man’s Fault. ” 

Enter Evil White Serial Killers- they are the .01 %  of their own population, serial because they are able to get away with it and/or exercise enough self-control to appear relatively normal and/or orchestrate and plan their dirty deeds. For them , there is no way anyone would believe they were just out having fun with no Truly Evil Agenda, and then POOF, something overtook them! No one is going to try and explain away Inherent Tendencies to violence. No one is going to  try and  soften up what the serial killers do because their mom was an alkie, or their dad beat them or their uncle molested them. No one is ever going to make up programs to mentor or otherwise sanity-ize disturbed white youth from the Outer-City. One reason is because the serial killer is the exception, not the rule. People don’t clutch their purses or lock their car doors for no reason at all, they do it because they innately sense Danger. They know the odds of The Profile of the 35-40 something serial killer guy scenario is pretty damn unlikely, but everyone avoids Oakland, at least parts of it like the plague it is.   

When the killing phenomenon is not-so-rare -Oakland- we just look the other way “oh, that is just too bad”. We don’t do that with comparably and ever-more-rare Official Serial Killer. Nor does the “I can’t believe it myself. Mr. Smith was always a good neighbor- quiet, unassuming, kept to himself. It’s just so sad. He lost his job, his wife left him, he gambled away everything, but no one would have ever known. He always was pleasant, he always waved to us. It’s such a tragedy.” No, this particular media-induced repsonse will never work  with Cobbins,Davidson et al.- their crying or no crying on those sound files above-except perhaps one of their mothers. “He was always a good boy. I don’t understand. ”  It will never work because everyone knows they weren’t normal, decent people who snapped.  An example that makes my point is the fact that hardly anyone reports witnessing crimes in Those Places , because they know there will be retaliation, and it will be swift and fatal if possible. They are even terrified of each other. Turning in the bad guy merits no reward but certain death.

Like so many other ills not caused by the body, we medicalize mayhem as well. If we do that, it implies there IS a fix, treatment, or at the very least- a kind of reverse mental hospice. If we can’t legally put someone out of OUR misery, we can at least make OURSELVES more ‘comfortable’.  When we hear the double-think illogical We Are The World, We Can Save the World, We Can All Be Astronauts crap, we might  look at them as if they are doing a scene from a new version of Theatre of the Absurd.  We see the long criminal record as having disregard for playing by basic rules, but need to toss in some More-PC-Than-Thou crime/PC/racial softener sheets in order to deal with the actual end result.  We want to shake our heads, but not really look , though when we drive by an accident or there is a crash on CNN, we do look. People don’t want to look at Channon and Chris because they don’t want to believe some awful truths. We cannot look their happy, smiling, bright faced photos in the eye and continue to lie to ourselves.

If there is one thing White people are good at, it’s what is termed in recovery movement babble ‘Denial’ .  However, before the rehab facility co-opted  that term, it had another meaning- it had a  function, and that was what is now called a “coping mechanism’. It didn’t equate to a form of PC self-lying, it was a form of mental protection that our heads do on their own, it is a form of self-protection. Without it, how would people take any risks at all without completely freaking out?  Could people drive, or fly or even trust any food we eat ?  It is also a function of the mind which helps us deal with the shock and awe of grief , loss, and enables us to continue and carry on our lives, creates a kind of religio-quasi-stasis where we simply don’t allow what is buried to bubble forth, enabling us not to take matters into our own hands, or in despair -harming ourselves. The media creates tainted tomatoes, lettuce or peanut butter hysteria, but its agenda is not PC-compatible with Real Danger.

When you think of this case, think of those kids who deserved to live, who did not deserve in any way the horrors that happened to them in their last moments , hours or days. Think of the grief and loss of the families before you retreat into your own litanies of PC denial/excuses. Think of the Christian and Newsom families’ Reality.  We ARE responsible to protect ourselves, but not in the form of retreat and denial.  The Correctness Polizei wages war on us by making us feel guilty, when we are in fact  the victim. It makes us feel responsible, when our children are slaughtered by others. It gaslights our minds and robs us of justifiable and righteous anger, calling us ‘Haters’.  It creates a ‘call and response’ and we slobber like Pavlov’s dogs when we hear the gentle regretful, yet compassionate tones of the reporter telling of the latest horrors.

You don’t have to accept it. You don’t have to accept the name-calling. There are some things you don’t have to forgive, because it’s not your job. You don’t have to Unconditionally Love your child’s killers. We worry so, so much about things like styrofoam and whether or not we should spank our kids, but we revert to system presets about anything truly horrible and surreptiously check each other’s eyes when these atrocities are rarely even mentioned between people in real-life, so worried are we that we may offend, that we may catch some small sign of disapproval, that we may be rejected from The Game.

 Remember yet another one of those ‘don’t use your brain’  chick-TV cliches “Do you want to be happy, or do you want to be right?”  suggesting that if you just let go of your own sense of justice or point of view , you’ll be less stressed out, hence happy. Well, that is another form of sweeping stuff under the rug. Go along to get along, it sucks but it sucks less than fighting , so don’t sweat the small stuff- in fact don’t sweat anything at all, we have it all scripted for you. Don’t worry, be happy, don’t be a shit-disturber and above all, don’t get mad or talk about it. Whee.  So, do  YOU want to be Nice, or Alive?

So .. what do we do in the meantime -besides moving away and/or arming ourselves, telling our children not to open the car window, that it is better to be thought ‘racist’ than dead, which is not-so-dissimilar to the self-protection classes for women in which they say it is better to be thought a bitch and yell “NO! I DON’T WANT YOUR HELP!”  then be attacked?

Back to what can we DO.   We can align ourselves with forces that refuse to Celebrate Adversity- that make us carry the burden, whether of omission or commision. Whatever way we can. Even if you must help behind-the-scenes, help those who have risked it all, help those you deem sincere , worthy and dedicated, who are able to do what you cannot-that counts and is appreciated. You can help in a service-oriented way, offering up a skill- you can help in a  practical way if you can, contributing towards operations.

 You can help by not participating in the low-end gossip-banter and realize how late in the day it is- meaning- not making things worse than they are. You can help by approaching our tasks in a serious, calm, grown-up way. You can educate yourself and others on the truth and even anonymously take that to the local level, actually talking to people you run into, especially youth and when you see these  little white kids  dressed like rap thugs, talk to them. You’ll be surrpised at the results when they actually think an adult gives a shit about them. When you see someone doing something right, tell them. Tell  them even if you don’t know them, perhaps especially then. Make an effort to mend fences, when that fence holds something worth protecting. Be the better man.

Cry me a river.~  Leonard Pitts, on the Christian/Newsom murders…..

I am not a paranoid person in general, and many times laughed at those whom I perceived to be such because they gave me the creeps, but now I can see why as far as internet stuff goes. Have you been watching the news? Do you  believe everything you see on TV happens exactly the way they tell it? Do you think there might be a reason?  Do you get that they are going to be increasingly ‘cracking down’ on groups, individuals and the sites you are used to going to for information and socializing – or acting like kids that wish they were still in school or for a parent-figure who might teach them how to behave or lecture them on the social graces they were not ‘privileged’ enough to grow up with- that this all might be gone soon?  At one point, I think They -as in ‘They Live’ thought that that majority of internet dissent was a good thing, as it kept people busy, and most of the time, did not lead to any real organizing or actions. Now however, they can and will try to say that internet material- and they will start with the most blatant of course-  leads to events  such as these little skinhead  kids becoming a threat to The Candidate.

Point is, they are ceasing to see the internet stuff as a release valve and a joke/distraction/entertainment, and knowing that The Powers That Be have no intention to do anything the people want- say the border problem for example- they know that the net is the resource for people who are disgruntled and looking for  information on how it all fits together- people who are starting to find out about how things really work- maybe they don’t know much and come in through some unrelated issue-no matter- The  ‘Theys’ are starting to see ‘net-hate’ or whatver they want to call it any given week as no longer a haven for the disenfranchised, the disgruntled and/or writers about such. The more tame if the bunch, who only dance near the subject or look at things in a philosophical or coded way will obviously not be first. The main thing is HOW this will come about. If they cannot take away what is commonly known as free-speech to shut you down, they will try to arrest and make an example of you, whether you actually broke any actual  law or not-

“I didn’t do anything, I didn’t say anything, I watched what I said, I never advocated, I never named anyone specific, I never published anyone’s information..” You don’t get it. Yes it is better not to do those things, but not doing those things does not exempt you. The only way you don’t get on their s4-list  is if you are part of Them, one of Them, or bought/owned by Them.   Now is the time for the people who have put themselves out there in some way or another- who might not be completely anonymous to take stock and count who their friends really are, who they know and whom they can really trust – maybe you will have to go through a middle person, who knows the third person- maybe because of infiltration you will have to set a cut-off date ‘no one who came around after X date/year’  or some other criteria ‘ Person X is trouble, they have (whatever)  no one who is tight or connected to  Person X. Period’. Point is, try to set some kind of criteria or way that they have something to lose, some way to verify who they are, etc-  I have accepted the fact if things get really bad here, I’m dead.

Right now you are better off keeping a low profile and not joining up with stuff, but taking stock of what you still have. If you are reading this, you may take it for granted, but you still have your freedom. You can see what is happening before your eyes, right?  You might think you are ‘safe’, but in truth, you are not.  Concentrate on your own life, outside and away from ‘internet activism’ or whatever you want to call it, you and yours will be better off, believe it. People operate under the illusion that internet stuff counts as the ‘Great Ubiquitous Doing Something’, but your own regular life counts much more. You are putting yourself at risk, and if you think they won’t contact you or find you, think again. The heat or spotlight is about to be turned up mega-high on anything or anyone perceived  as ‘hateful’ or ‘threatening’.

I have tried to warn people.  You stand to lose an awful lot, whatever the level of involvement , who you think you know and trust- you could be wrong. You could go to prison, you could do irreparable damage to your own life, your kid’s lives- all the while thinking you are doing this to make their lives and their future better, you are ‘Doing Something’  but the price you might pay is very , very steep, and don’t think when it happens, that people will care. They won’t. Look at what has happened already to people we ‘know’, even if we don’t really know them at all. Is it good for their kids to have a parent possibly go to prison?

Understand that you cannot have a real trusted group based on anonymous identities.  This is what I have heard, being privy to how regular, ‘legit’ groups work , groups that say don’t have anything to do with WN, but have a functioning structure and agendas all the same: small, basically closed networks, then>>  peripheral people who are either considered helpers or info-people but not let in close, they only get superficial contact with one member , at most two, and peripheral person may or may not be even aware that they are helping , then >>anyone outside of these camps is pretty much considered either supporter or opposer, and not let anywhere near the periphery or close-in level. I was either perceived as  level one or two by the group I am describing the workings of, and thus when they had one meeting in a public place, only two of them this time, though I had met them several times before- we can call them Gary and Katie -after movie characters, not even close to real names-  neither one acknowledged or recognized me- perhaps it had been too long, maybe I have changed a little bit since then and they didn’t recognize me, or perhaps Katie did not want to let on that she knew me to the other, though I knew both of them – though only on the peripheral level-which brings me to ..the ones who are on the trusted level like these two were made a point of sharing information regularly with each other- these people did their homework, they did not get info strictly from their ‘friends’ or chat boards-they had looked stuff up on their own- about individuals, who supports what causes, and so on. It was clear Katie knew Gary very well, and whether she remembered me or not, she wasn’t bothered by my sitting there.

Just because someone has an mp3 player earphones on and is on a computer, doesn’t mean they aren’t listening. Like that saying ‘all who snore are not sleeping’. I wondered if she knew more about me since our last meeting and that is why she didn’t acknowledge me. I know for a fact ‘Katie’ , because of her particular line of work, could be putting herself at risk for having an alliance with Gary.  I also know she doesn’t agree with all aspects of her work. But she could be putting him even more at risk. Maybe that is why their talk was very to-the-point and they didn’t linger long. It is hard to imagine he didn’t know about her work and connections.  Her friend Gary, was not known to be an easy-to-get-along with character-he could be perceived as somewhat belligerent when provoked, but not dumb by any stretch. Neither was Katie, for that matter. Having seen Katie work behind the scenes before , I knew she would protect him, whether he knew it or not. At her age, she was well past the self-centeredness of youth, unusual for someone with no children, whatever their age. From his expression, it almost seemed as if he were being patient with her- tolerating her, but his posture and movements suggested he was not worried he would be betrayed.

When they left, each had a new mission or task to do or find out, whom to talk to about whatever- then they planned when they would next meet. It was clear there was a sense of reciprocity and interdependency, which are probably two ingredients of any group that is truly cohesive and solid- that the members need each other and help each other in one way or another, that they don’t fear or look down on one another, that this was an economy of trust-almost familial rather than “what do you have I might want? how can you benefit me? what’s in it for me? ”  Without a sense of interdependency and reciprocity, there is imbalance and heightened risk for some of the participants, little-to-none for others.  Listening and watching them, It wasn’t as if one was the Fearless Leader and the other was the minion who did all the actual work.  No one said anything about the internet or screen names.

I wouldn’t post this if it were at all a joke or make up stuff  to scare people for no reason. The dangers are more than what you can see, and in the end, you will be asking yourself, “was it worth it? What, if anything, have I achieved versus what I lost? Have I caused or suffered more harm than whatever good influence came of it?” Please don’t write what I am saying off and laugh, because it isn’t funny at all. Why do you think people disappear? Don’t take this as saying I am against you or have turned traitor, I am not talking about that- I am talking about dealing with people that are probably not what you are used to in your own real lives.  I am not saying you are a bad person for what you, me and others believe.  If I say there is a real threat out there that is going to increase very soon, you can believe me or not, and keep doing what you want, and pay what I say no mind or think it’s real ha ha entertainment. When you go from having a relatively normal existence to  every day living in fear of what will happen next to you and your kids, it is not ha ha funny. As I said, most people , when times get rough, are going to look out for only themselves. Some will do that even if things are not rough.

Remember what I said, that your own life counts much more towards what you believe in, and no matter what problems you have, you could make them  much worse in trying to make things better for others. And they will say “you brought this upon yourself, ” and whether that part is true or not to a greater or lesser degree, they will blame you entirely to protect themselves and they will not be around to help you when the chips fall, regardless of anything said before when times were good.  You may not understand how people can operate, because maybe you yourself don’t function that way, but we are not talking about the Golden Rule here. When you find yourself worrying about how you will survive, you really think about these things, and about what I said, that keeping your own regular life separate from a land of  virtual people that may or may not learn a lesson and turn that lesson into something elemental-  a tool forged of iron and blood, intellect and passion. Others might turn a lesson into a weapon against you. You just don’t know what you are dealing with. It is akin to the game shows of old that had the three mystery doors from which you could choose except for  the fact that there’s never any prize behind them.

You might be a person new to the ‘scene’  reading this and think “oh how negative, she must be really dumb or a really messed up , disturbed person or she wouldn’t be saying all this”. No, I’m none of those things. It doesn’t benefit me any to write any of this, but it might help you. It might give you pause, before it is too late.  Not because I am an ‘anti/traitor/fed/jew/whateverwhatever’.  I’m writing this because I am not, and I know there are probably some left who are not only  not those things, but still have some semblance of conscience and sanity left.  Who knows, maybe someone’s parents will read this, and they might take it in a different way, they might think that they have to really involve themselves in their children’s or even their adult children’s lives and be supportive to them, not cast them out or work against them. Maybe the parents might offer the child they rejected another chance rather than write them off. Maybe the parent would  take a moment and even call their son or daughter they haven’t spoken to for a long time and try to set things right and that parent would realize that their own blood is important and not to be so disappointed that they believe this or that and give up on their own kids.

In the 80’s I had a friend who would go to AA, and though I luckily didn’t have any kind of substance problem myself, I went with her for support. No, she wasn’t a drunk, she was a rich kid into chipping at heroin and speed. Some of the language and belief system of those meetings included bumper-sticker philopsophy like ‘one day at a time’ and ‘let go and let God’  but I also remember them talking about ‘making amends’. That is a tricky thing, making amends.  In order to make amends, one must admit one went  wrong. Some people just can’t do this. I suppose that is why there are programs like AA to get people to even understand that stuff they did wasn’t right, and to try and repair it, if they can.  As I sat there and heard all these horror stories, at least I thought, these people are trying to make their lives better, and at least they even care to try and set things right. Sometimes amends don’t count for much than making the addict feel better about themselves. Perhaps when people are under the influence they can’t think straight, maybe they know this on some level, but it prevents them from taking ‘credit’ for things they do or stop them from doing things they do. It was very hard to be this girl’s friend. I don’t even know if I can honestly call it that.

There would be times I thought she was getting better, she said all the right things, looked and sounded to be doing OK, then would secretly backslide and make everyone else who cared for her miserable. It was always  all about her, regardless of how fun she was, how talented or charming- in the end it all boiled down to what she could get, her advantage-her payoff- your loss- and if you threatened her way of life or criticized her in any way, again, you would become the traitor, she would talk about you then deny it, she would talk about one person one way, then talk about you poorly to that same person.  In retrospect, I can see how expert she was in playing with people and discovering their weaknesses and vulnerabilities in order that she could better exploit them. For those who didn’t waste their time garnering merit and high test scores using a skill-set based upon what will soon become a dead language- that means she was a user, as in Usery. When I hear about how we should all become like this to survive, it just sounds pathetic,and is a sad statement about ourselves. Yay, let’s all be  self-centered, non-altruistic takers just like the enemy! Celebrate Defectiveness, glory in becoming Just Like Them-because being like that IS a form of defectiveness. If you are in a scenario where you have to be like that, even among your own, something is very, very wrong. Only one thing- Are they your own?

I don’t think she even cared how it affected her parents, how the stress of her addictions may have contributed to their splitting up, how her brother was affected- she just didn’t care- it was all about her. In her case it was fortunate they had money  as her dad was some bigwig in a local  huge company and thus, despite all the emotional trauma they went through, no one in it suffered that way. They knew I tried to help her, keep her away from people who would keep her sucked into that stuff, and hopefully be a good friend and influence on her, but they knew I was limited in what I could do against the demon addiction and the accompanying lies, and apssive-aggressive nature of the thing itself.   I kept going to school and working, and we lost touch. I hope she is alive and doing OK. About 15 years ago I sent her a letter in care of her parent’s place asking how she was and telling her about my own life , but never heard anything back.

It  truly is an awful feeling to love someone and not be able to talk sense into them, not be able to help them, not be able to reach them- to have anything you say or do make sense to them, even when you are trying to protect them- often from themselves but sometimes from outside forces- they don’t listen, they come to be paranoid and mistrust you,  make you the bad guy-  and in this process you end up getting very  hurt yourself, and just to make it all worse- maybe the friend you cared so much for is angry at you for trying to help them. Are they angry because they knew you were right? Are they angry because being mad is easier than an apology?  Can they just not bear being wrong ? Do they hate themselves and thus you , when they call you cowardly , or other names and  blame you for things they did?   Do you try to keep helping them because you care, despite others calling you even more names like ‘codependent’  or ‘loving too much’?   Despite the fact they will take from you whatever they can get and then laugh at you? When they appear to be far more interested in rebelling/revenge-seeking against their parents, who from all accounts appear to have given them a good life and only wanted the best for them? They turn away from their family, you, or anyone/anything who has the reek of sanity and normalcy as contemptible, boring, ‘sell outs to to The Man’- and they go right back and choose darkness because  darkness is all they know.  Is this all they think they can do or deserve ?  I don’t know.  That kind of mentality is far from my own. I really hope you take what I am trying to say seriously. This story  isn’t quite woven out of the same cloth as the one I opened with, but it is stitched together with the same needle.

http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?search=warning&searchmode=none

monition Look up monition at Dictionary.com
“warning,” c.1375, from O.Fr. monition, from L. monitionem (nom. monitio) “warning, reminding,” noun of action from monere “to warn” (see monitor).
garnish Look up garnish at Dictionary.com
c.1300, from O.Fr. garniss-, stem of garnir “provide, furnish, defend,” from P.Gmc. *warnejan “be cautious, guard, provide for” (cf. O.E. warnian “to take warning, beware;” see warn). Sense evolution is from “arm oneself” to “fit out” to “embellish,” which was the earliest meaning in Eng., though the others also were used in M.E. Culinary sense of “to decorate a dish for the table” predominated after 1693. Older meaning survives in legal sense of “warning of attachment of funds” (1585).
klaxon Look up klaxon at Dictionary.com
“loud warning horn,” 1910, originally of cars, said to have been named for the company that made them, probably based on Gk. klazein “to roar,” cognate with L. clangere “to resound.”
ammunition Look up ammunition at Dictionary.com
c.1626, from Fr. soldiers’ faulty separation of M.Fr. la munition, from L. munitio “a fortifying,” and at first meaning all military supplies in general. The mistake in the word perhaps was by infl. of Fr. a(d)monition “warning.” The error was corrected in Fr., but retained in Eng. Shortened form ammo is attested from 1917.
advise Look up advise at Dictionary.com
1297, avisen, from O.Fr. aviser, from avis (see advice). The verb preserves the older spelling. Advisory “weather warning” first recorded 1931.
alarm Look up alarm at Dictionary.com
c.1325, from O.Fr. alarme, from It. all’arme “to arms!” (lit. “to the arms”). An interj. that came to be used as the name of the call or warning. Extended 16c. to “any sound to warn of danger or to arouse.” Weakened sense of “apprehension, unease” is from 1833. Variant alarum is due to the rolling -r- in the vocalized form. The verb is 1590, from the noun. Alarmist “one addicted to sounding alarms” is from 1793.
siren Look up siren at Dictionary.com
c.1366, “sea nymph who by her singing lures sailors to their destruction,” from O.Fr. sereine, from L.L. Sirena, from L. Siren, from Gk. Seiren [“Odyssey,” xii.39 ff.], perhaps lit. “binder,” from seira “cord, rope.” Meaning “device that makes a warning sound” (on an ambulance, etc.) first recorded 1879, in reference to steamboats. Fig. sense of “one who sings sweetly and charms” is recorded from 1590.
catbird Look up catbird at Dictionary.com
1731, common name for the North American thrush (Dumetella Carolinensis), so called from its warning cry, which resembles that of a cat. Catbird seatis a 19c. Dixieism, popularized by Brooklyn Dodgers baseball announcer Red Barber and by author James Thurber (1942).

” ‘Sitting in the catbird seat’ meant sitting pretty, like a batter with three balls and no strikes on him.” [Thurber, “Stories from New Yorker”]

aboard Look up aboard at Dictionary.com
1494, from O.Fr. à “on” + board “board,” from Frank. *bord (see board); the “boarding” or sides of a vessel extended to the ship itself. The usual M.E. expression was within shippes borde. The call all aboard! as a warning to passengers is attested from 1838.
step (n.) Look up step at Dictionary.com
O.E. steppa (Mercian), stæpe, stepe (W.Saxon) “stair, act of stepping,” from the source of step (v.). Meaning “action which leads toward a result” is recorded from 1549. Stepladder (one with steps instead of rungs) is from 1751. Warning phrase watch your step is attested from 1934. Step-dancing first recorded 1886.
memento Look up memento at Dictionary.com
1401, “Psalm cxxxi in the Canon of the Mass” (which begins with the L. word Memento and in which the dead are commemorated), from L. memento “remember,” imperative of meminisse “to remember,” a reduplicated form, related to mens “mind.” Meaning “reminder, warning” is from 1582; sense of “keepsake” is first recorded 1768. Memento mori “reminder of death” (1592) is from L., lit. “remember that you must die.”
notice (n.) Look up notice at Dictionary.com
c.1412, “information, intelligence,” from L. notitia “a being known, fame, knowledge,” from notus “known,” pp. of (g)noscere “come to know, to get to know, get acquainted (with),” from PIE *gno-sko-, a suffixed form of root *gno- (see know). Sense of “formal warning” is attested from 1594. Meaning “a sign giving information” is from 1805. The verb is attested from c.1450, originally “to notify;” sense of “to point out” is from 1627. Meaning “to take notice of” is attested from 1757, but was long execrated in England as an Americanism (occasionally as a Scottishism, the two crimes not being clearly distinguished).
monitor Look up monitor at Dictionary.com
1546, “senior pupil at a school charged with keeping order, etc.,” from L. monitor “one who reminds, admonishes, or checks,” from monere “to admonish, warn, advise,” related to memini “I remember, I am mindful of,” and to mens “mind,” from PIE base *men- “to think” (see mind (n.)). The lizard so called because it is supposed to give warning of crocodiles (1826). Meaning “squat, slow-moving type of ironclad warship” (1862) so called from name of the first vessel of this design, chosen by Capt. Ericsson because it was meant to “admonish” the Confederate leaders in the U.S. Civil War. Broadcasting sense of “a device to continuously check on the technical quality of a transmission” (1931) led to special sense of “a TV screen displaying the picture from a particular camera.” The verb is attested from 1924.

“What fresh hell is this?” quoth Dorothy Parker when the telephone rang.  The same can be said about television.

 

 Rainbow skittles kidz , title of song is ‘First Time’ . Gawd. Many of the songs they do are not kid-appropriate- see further down the link to the one “party like a rock star’ with the rapper and dancing white girls.

Say you have laryngitis and are running a fever,coughing up yuk. You’ve done your asthma inhaler/codeine syrup speedball , taken the aspirin/motrin/throat lozenges/whatever  and are even starting to resent old people for making diapers uncool, because in this vaguely hallucinotory state you really don’t want to think about having to even walk to the loo after imbibing the volunimous amounts of liquids you were told to drink. You can’t talk on the phone, you can’t even yell at your kids- one brings a cool towel for your head. You realize you must look and sound really bad for your kids to be this nice and. There’s no relief  from the gross, sweaty-fever feeling from opening the door or window as it is 80+ outside. You become fascinated with checking out the far reaches of the only 1.00 a month extra low-rent cable system, and just when you think you may have ascended just one stair above you were previously, you come crashing down into the furrowed metal escalator, your hair about to be pulled down into the machine….

You have entered the Evil Realm of KidZ Bop.

This kidz bop crap is usually advertised on TV during kid’s shows, buy the record type stuff featuring hand-picked multi-culti quilts of kids cavorting through the landscape whilst some premade mix of kid version of Laurence Welk  chorus chants along . OK, bad enough, right? Uh, no. Check out what this little wannabe broadway singer does to Blondie’s ‘Heart of Glass’. 

http://www.kidzbop.com./video/player/4122

Someone should video capture this next one- I looked for it on You Tube and couldn’t find this particular version, which features these three young teenish white girls as back up dancers AKA ‘flygirls’ to this little ghetto-thug in training. After looking on you tube, I found out there that the KB version ‘cleaned up” the words, but kids watching this type of video will pick up messages that are visual and have nothing to do with dirty lyrics that people are oh-so-worried about, which makes me think the messages conveyed and the subtexts conatined therein, like “oh look, there’s a black rapper teenager with some cheerleadery blonde teenage chicks dancing. Well, that must be diversity, right?  And diversity is always mentioned in a good context – so this must be a good thing too” -that is one message. Maybe another is “hey if you are a happenin rap star, you can get young hot white girls!”- Still another might be “if you are an in-shape white teen girl who isn’t all uptight, you might get picked to be involved in some way with some black rapper dude. Wowwww..”  These are just some of the ideas being put across in this KB nonsense- unless of course you are an EvilNaziRacistHater- who is anyone who doesn’t see this scene of the ghetto-thuggish black kid with the 3 prancing 14 white girls absolutely wonderful and healthy entertainment.

‘Party like a Rock Star’  The ‘clean’ version. No real kids will ever look up the real song if they watch this.Not that they’d need to, everything that needs to get across to them is evident in the video, available on cable TV in the ‘kids’ section.

http://www.kidzbop.com./video/player/11395

There are many creepy things about this kidz bop made-up TV kid-culture, where I have yet to see any parents or even teachers- no authority figures, only more and more buddies and pals- no on in charge, no one to watch out for them- but it is portrayed as a No-Parent Paradise or Parents-as-Peripheral-Accessories- as do many of the shows on TV on the kid channels. See the ads for this stuff and people think, “OK, annoying , possibly grating, but harmless fun, right?” Wrong. POINT this out to your kids. Tell them “do you see what they are trying to promote here?” “What  do you see in this show? Do you see parents? What do you think about the way those kids are dancing? Do you think that is normal? If you had a daughter, would you want her to do that? ”  Ask them questions that will make them think and lead them to their own conclusions abotu the utter worthlessness of much electronic ‘entertainment’ for children.

Do not let the television subvert what you try to teach them. Yes, keeping them away from it is good, but it is so prevalent they are bound to come upon some part of it- therefore it may be good to approach it head-on, rather than just say “Oh, we don’t let them watch TV.” It is better to put your own ‘chip’ in their brain so they can heuristically recognize it when they see it, and reject it, like an anti-virus program does. Teach them about the ways language is used to make dangerous, bad stuff look noble and fun. Teach them to stop and think and not be afraid to be the person who speaks up and says “this is garbage, give us real books.”  No one wants to be the dissenter, no one wants to be the one not enjoying the party in general, but you can teach them to take pride, not shame in rejecting inaccurate memes perpetrated upon them by the Hydra that is media, education, etc. The little light of recognition will come on within them, as their eyes become more and more clear. Yes, they will be able to confront this  poison and even if at first they look at it neutrally, they will quickly  come to see it for what it is, a manipulation , a twisting of what is real and good.