No one knows what it's like
To be the bad man
To be the sad man,
Behind blue eyes
No one knows what it's like
To be hated
To be fated
To telling only lies
'Behind Blue Eyes' The Who, 1971
The Who singing about how the White Man is always slated for the Bad Guy Role.
“if they didn’t do it, whatever they did is bad enough,” said Duke University president Richard Brodhead
an audio I made -not all of this is on the audio, I added it to it after I did the audio-
http://media.switchpod.com//users/silentconsort/20081004143854.mp3 or
http://www.savefile.com/download/1822196?PHPSESSID=253b99c8954f7c91dc7607025d9f2f4a
Stuart Taylor is dead on in his analysis/assessment/dissection/indictment of the Duke Rape Farce. He chronicles the case in depth, going into important details and inconsistencies regarding the accuser’s statements and the DNA results . In this audio we learn a lot of things that were not widely covered in the media or covered at all regarding Mike Nifong and what his agenda may have been in pursuing the case even after the DNA results excluded the students in question. Nifong wanting to stay in his position so as to get his pension, which was three years away- Nifong wanting to win the black democratic vote by still defending the false accuser even after the boys were proven innocent.Nifong hiding the DNA results from the defense for months, while the media machine churned on about Evil White Men and their supposed historical and endless abuse of black women.
Taylor addresses many other aspects of the case, including accusations of ‘racism’ and is very familiar with the many characters involved in this story and their roles/ He knows who skated off to what school, and who is unrepentant. There is a question and answer at the end, one question asked was “why didn’t anyone go after the accuser?” Attorney general Roy Cooper stated that she was mentally ill, and pursuing a case against her would inflame racial tensions. Taylor says that Duke itself was afraid there might have been riots, and there might have been walkouts by hospital staff which could have shut down the school, and rips the local paper for hugely dishonest reporting and says that Jesse Jackson stated that he would pay the dancer’s way through college whether or not she was lying.
The ‘Race has Nothing to Do with it’ Card. Well sometimes it does, sometimes not so much… it depends on whatever memes the media are fostering that week-
I’m beginning to think this ‘race did/didn’t matter’ nonsense is like minutes on a cell phone. When you don’t use them one month, if you have a good plan, you can roll them over to the next month when they may or may not be needed, depending on how media wants to spin the story. You see how sometimes they say ‘race has nothing to do with it’ – as in the Channon Christian/Chris Newsom murders, in which both of them were also sexually assaulted and tortured, and sometimes the media says race has everything to do with it. Even when the ubiquitous It, didn’t even happen. In one case three young, bright lives were almost ruined by a false accusation. In the other 2 young bright lives were snuffed out after being tortured and raped, and there was no ‘made-up’ about any of it. Yet we are supposed to believe race had ‘nothing to do with it’, or that ‘wrong place, wrong time’, or ‘they could have picked anyone’. Yeah, Right. I notice the news was quite lively over the alleged assault of this dancer/escort/whatever when it involved young White men as suspects.The accuser has walked away and from doing news searches on her, is apparently writing a book while the three boys are probably struggling to rebuild their lives, reputations, and relationship with their parents and friends- not to mention financial and continuing legal stress.
Taylor recalls the Tawana Brawley case, and the way the media pushes cases like this for its own reasons, that of pushing the false meme that ‘white men are constantly through the ages exploiting and abusing black women’. A meme that Taylor doesn’t mention is the one that is supposed to be universally accepted, which is All White Men are Evil. Rich White Men are Especially Evil. Evil White Racists. Evil White Rapists. Just Evil ,White, Period.
Rich White Boy College Killer Meme-
Of course there was the Martha Moxley, Mary Jo Kopechne cases that were real. Did those start the Privileged Evil White Killer meme? As opposed to the Hollywood White Truckstop Serial Killer? Then there was the Robert Chambers case (1986) dubbed the ‘Preppie Murderer’, which only added to the Evil White Boy Killers are Lurking Everywhere, they could be Anyone. The failure to make distinctions leads people to false assumptions and beliefs. How many of these type murders happen compared to the almost daily killings in Oakland and San Francisco? We accept these daily murders as ‘normal’ because they are NOT Whites committing them. What does that say? The meme of the Rich College White Boy is not even worth a meme, let alone a false one. The Duke boys were not even part of the very rare club of the rare Privileged Killer/Rapist/etc. They DIDN’T do it, yet their lives are forever changed, tainted with the stain of the accusation itself. It could have been prevented from becoming the nightmare it did had Nifong come forward with the DNA evidence that exonerated them. Stuart also has a few things to say about Nancy Grace , Joe Scarborough, Wendy Murphy and other media people acting as the prosecution and their habit of stating falsities regardless of evidence.
Until Proven Innocent: Political Correctness and the Shameful Injustices of the Duke Lacrosse Rape Case http://www.cato.org/event.php?eventid=4024
Featuring the coauthor Stuart Taylor Jr. Senior Writer, National Journal, with comments by Victoria Toensing, Former Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Criminal Division, Justice Department.
Use your right-clicker on your mouse and ‘save as’ for these files as it seems they don’t work if you simply click them
Watch the Event in Real Video
Listen to the Event in Real Audio (Audio Only)
Download a Podcast of the Event (MP3)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The Dark Truth about Race and Rape-
it appears some Reality Denying TWIT has ratted out the you tube video I placed here to add to my point about the ‘dark truth’ , I hope they rename the file some alpha-numeric harder-to-take-down-name and repost it- making sure to not use relevant tags, only those of pop stars, so as many people can see it as possible. The videos are everywhere, easy to find on google. Or even German AOL . They almopst always only put any White suspect’s picture in the google news section if you search for certain words- but..all the other stories with no pictures- look at the names- figure it out. Sometimes yu have to use words like ‘alleged’ or ‘accused’ in conjunction with the search term. It’s the truth, what the videos say, what flawlesslogic site says. I’m not that great at math, but I can do simple addition and sort things into groups. So can most people, hence google avoiding the use of pictures on its news links next to the story. When I see that stuff, when I read stories about robberies and description of suspects is not mentioned at all, other than say “there were three men, they were wearing jogging suits” , but no description of the men themselves- what do you think we default to in our heads anyway? You think we ACTUALLY are thinking it was a band of escaped stowaway Irish rogues? Do media jerkoffs really believe we will be steered into thinking that? I know, I know. It’s just Not Nice to be Reminded of The Facts. Facts Sometimes Really , Really Suck. Especially when they Keep Happening.
And that men like http://www.selbytimes.co.uk/selby-news/Race-hate-case-pair-appeal.4499916.jp should be rotting away in some POS Santa Ana jail, wasting taxpayer money for wrting articles just as I am doing right now when THESE impulse-driven, frontal-lobe lacking Othellos are out running loose? This is the REALITY, THIS is why you MUST tell your daughters about the danger and not let them be naive. YES, SCARE THEM. So many middle/upper middling White liberal types think that to scare their kids is the Worst Thing Ever. They shouldn’t know about Bad Evil Things.
Oh, but they SHOULD. It will give them a MUCH better chance of staying ALIVE and UNVIOLATED . That’s why the OLD versions of fairy tales were so useful. They didn’t ONLY teach lessons about what was important and not to do bad, but that there actually are Bad Things out there. The over-sheltered concept mixed with the everyone is great and = concept is not only stupid and false, but dangerous!
http://www.sun-sentinel.com/news/local/broward/sfl-flbrapist1001sboct01,0,7028741.story
http://www.reporter.bz/index.php?option=content&task=view&id=3084&Itemid=2
http://www.pjstar.com/news/x282357384/Change-of-venue-denied-for-accused-rapist
http://www.kansascity.com/116/story/814001.html
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2008190178_webdias19m.html
in case some officious little fruitcake takes it down again here is another link and an example of even a foreign search where you can easily find the same stuff and more.
http://suche.aolsvc.de/aol/search?invocationType=topsearchbox.search&query=rape+blacks+david+duke&rp=
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9bC9pd8b86E
It appears White college boys are NOT raping black women, and black women are not raping White college boys, at least not physically. If anything, SHE ‘raped’ THEM. What this accuser did to these boys and their families – a false accusation that leads to extensive destructive media coverage does lead to a huge sense of violation- in this case x 3 +family + friends and uncountable exponential other damages. If this is offensive to you, then you are offended by Reality. I’m offended too, at the fact that it is reality. The real , and probably not surprising stats, below:
Studies from the late 1950s showed that the vast majority of rapes were same-race offenses. Research in Philadelphia carried out in 1958 and 1960 indicated that of all rapes, only 3.2 percent were black-on-white assaults and 3.6 percent were white-on-black. Since that time, the proportion of black-on-white rapes has soared. In a 1974 study in Denver, 40 percent of all rapes were of whites by blacks, and not one case of white-on-black rape was found. In general, through the 1970s, black-on-white rape was at least ten times more common that white-on-black rape. …in 1988 there were 9,406 cases of black-on-white rape and fewer than ten cases of white-on-black rape. [320] Another researcher concludes that in 1989, blacks were three or four times more likely to commit rape than whites, and that black men raped white women thirty times as often as white men raped black women. [321]
http://library.flawlesslogic.com/rape.htm
http://whytnblak.wordpress.com/usdoj-homicide-trends-by-race/
Don’t cry to me with your name-calling hysteria “RACIST!” as if I made all this up, as if I created these stats to prove my point. Reality proves my point. BE angry that it does happen. You think Dr. Farrakhan or other black nationalists want this to continue? I bet they don’t. Neither black or white ‘extremists’ as any racial loyalist is called, wants their men to rape or their women to be raped. Answer? Stay away from each other. Don’t go to the others area. Travel in groups , don’t go out by yourself late at night unaccompanied by a capable male. Don’t go to bars and get wasted. Lock your doors and windows. Don’t feel you have to be nice or friendly to everyone because if you don’t it might make you look like a bitch. Don’t allow your daughters to attend parties where there is drinking, no chaperones, at places where you don’t know the parents or there are no parents.
Tell your children they can always call you to come get them if they ever are feeling uncomfortable or afraid or if shady characters show up unannounced-tell them they can say no, they should not ‘go along to get along ‘ and risk their lives, or at best end up beat up, diseased, possibly pregnant by rape, or disfigured-at worst dead. Protecting them and teaching them about how the media lies about how everyone is the same and at one big barney picnic, that is all BS- that is as important as the drunk-driving save-a-life campaigns you hear so much about. Look at it this way, when you go to shop for your family,you look for the freshest milk, you look for the chicken or meat packages that look healthy and not old. Maybe the older packages are a dollar off , maybe they are a little off-color but you probably won’t get sick from it- but if you had to choose, you’d choose the fresher one and pay extra right?
You insure your car, and lock it when you get out, as you do your house or apartment. You worry about virus attacks on your computer or phishing scams to steal your credit card #’s. Maybe it isn’t likely it will happen to you, but you protect against it and take safeguards anyway, right? Do the same for your children.It isn’t about ‘hate’, it is about protecting and looking out for those you love. Do I ‘hate’ milk past its sell date? No, but I would rather avoid it. I’d rather go hungry than eat potato salad at a picnic that’s been sitting out because food poisoning is no fun, even if everyone else is wolfing it down and having a grand old time. The same rule applies to dangerous associations. Sure that particular gallon of milk is probably OK, or that particular potato salad MIGHT have only been sitting out 10 minutes, but when it comes to bigger risks than getting sick,we tend to ignore the real risks and danger associated with such. Risks than could get you raped, robbed, killed.
No one gets called names for not visiting hacker sites or using spyware protection, no one in their right mind says things like you need to experience all the computer code that is out there, put your credit card out there on your bumper sticker of your car- what, do you not trust people? You just think the worst of people don’t you? You’re just a hater. Would people actually call you names for not taking risks you are fairly sure are going to harm you? Well that is what they actually are doing. Your car insurance, your anti virus, your antibacterial soap- getting you to worry and thus make money off your worries, all the while trying to get you to look the other way , give you a false sense of security, impart to you a sense that there is nobility in sacrificing your children, in being so high and mighty you will throw them in front of an oncoming train, or into shark-infested waters because you are better than those people who would judge a train by its powerful engine and inability to stop on a dime, or deprive the shark of the benefits of being around your daughter or son because hey, most sharks are socio-economically disadvantaged, and there simply aren’t enough Shark EmpathyStart programs to train little baby sharks not to follow the scent of blood to its source. They just need more money to help those trains and sharks from killing.
You don’t HAVE to believe that suffering and being terminally uncomfortable and threatened is good for you , and worse yet, that you SHOULD do it because it makes you a better person. don’t need to experience everyone else’s DNA code or cultural code. Linux users are not hounded to death to attend Microsoft Tolerance training, are they? If we are allowed to have preferences with machines, with code, with music, with art (or are we?)- why cannot we have preferences in all areas of our lives-for sticking with what we know we like, and what works, and staying away from things we are fairly certain will at worst kill us, and at best irritate us and make life consistently less productive, inspiring, and take away from our ability to exist in the circumstances that we function best in?
I’m sure those Duke boys learned some very important lessons, one of which I hope is to be very particular about anyone they choose to invite into their sphere, no matter how peripheral or temporary they may seem. They have suffered loss of reputation, vilification and shame, all undeserved- not to mention the incredible stress, probably a hostile environment at school, loss of time they could have been pursuing their studies but were consumed with this case- and their poor parents- as a mother of sons I can only imagine the hell they went through- emotionally, physically, financially-I am sure this has drained them and taken away from their lives tremendously. I wish all of them well.
http://www.sfgate.com/maps/sfhomicides/ 82 this year thus far
http://www.sfgate.com/maps/oaklandhomicides/ 105 this year so far
PDF Files – civil case against Duke U, parental and otherwise
- ^ Complaint, Part 1
- ^ Complaint, Part 2
- ^ Complaint, Part 3
- ^ Complaint, Part 4
- ^ Complaint, Part 5
- ^ Complaint, Part 6
Other sources:
http://www.renewamerica.us/columns/roberts/070418 a neo-connish/patriotardic site, but has good info on the case
http://www.newsobserver.com/1202/story/562936.html has 47 pictures from the case including flyers and posters that were put up even after Nifong knew the truth. Shows the obligatory expected women protesters who believed the story.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Ok now for some weirdness I found digging around months ago. Can’t be sure if it is the same person, what with the fake hair and contacts.
Now some of you might recognize a pic on this page, but you may remember it as not being connected to this accuser stripper chick but pic used by an anonymous forum poster who was also black . A google search for Crystal gail mangum yields this pic (have to turnoff the google search nanny filter to get it) . http://whatmenthinkofwomen.blogspot.com/2007/07/nappy-headed-feminist-in-denial-over.html
same picture http://www.cupidsaddiction.com/charlotte/escort-directory.html
Anyone put this together yet? Hint: Screen name began with ‘crypto’ , if that doesnt jog your memory, maybe this will:
http://www.naughty.com/Adult_Businesses/Escorts/Female/Charlotte-94/A-Pleasure-Ryde-1984/
wayback machine as the current site is offline or down http://web.archive.org/web/20070104100638/http://www.pleasureryde.com/
http://www.vnnforum.com/showthread.php?t=42815&page=2 discussion of Duke case . A woman in this thread had posted pictures that linked to her escort site in NC- Is she one and the same as this Duke party hooker? Did the blog poster use mangum’s picture or vice versa? I dont know, but I do know I remember seeing that picture posted on the board , a pic that is now red X’d out on an old thread-and in researching stuff related to the Duke case searching the accuser’s name discovering that same photo and though I wouldn’t say I have bona fide photographic memory, my memory for photos is pretty good. That same picture in the google image search for Mangum is the same picture on the forum poster’s site, which is now offline.
One thought on “Revisiting the Duke University Rape Farce”