Lawyer, n. One skilled in circumvention of the law.
Warman Calls Canadian Senator “Ni**er C*nt”
Mark Fournier of FreeDominion has written a hard-hitting article exposing Richard Warman who has filed over 25 complaints against White nationalists who post on the Internet. He is a self described anti-racist. He likes to lurk on the Internet using phoney names, often female. The material Mark Fournier uses came out at the Marc Lemire Internet hearing which is ongoing. Warman in 2003 posted a foul comment about a Canadian Negro Senator who moved from being a leftist student radical in the late 1960s to being a socially conservative opponent of abortion, same sex marriage and the homosexual agenda.Now the connection to why Warman called Senator Anne Cools a “ni**er c*nt” is becoming clearer.
Warman is a member of the radical homosexual group EGALE. Pam MacEachern represented EGALE for the same-sex marriage Supreme Court advisory ruling on same sex marriage. [They ruled that Canada’s traditional heterosexual definition of marriage must go.] Senator Anne Cools intervened (Sept 10, 2003) in this case, only 5 days after Warman posted the message on the FreedomSite message board (Sept 5, 2003). Senator Cools would be seen to be a turncoat to the leftist cause.Calling her a “nigger cunt” would be a nasty piece of vengeance dressed up as the activity of a “racist” bigot.Pam MacEachern represented Warman at the libel case against Paul Fromm earlier this year. She is a well known Ottawa lesbian. Warman has known MacEachern dating back to March, 2003, when MacEachern <http://www.chrt-tcdp.gc.ca/search/view_html.asp?doid=453&lg=_e&isruling >
represented the CHRC in the Kyburz case. They got the largest award ever received by a tribunal ($37,500 – of which $30,000 was awarded to Warman as “special compensation”). There are some strange connections in Ottawa.Oh, yes, no one rose to Warman’s agent provocateur bait. No one joined his thread to make abusive comments about Senator Cools. Mark Fournier
January 18, 2008
“Time to go back to when the women nigger imports knew their place…
And that place was NOT in public!” – Richard Warman referring to Sen. Anne Cools – Is Richard Warman a racist bigot, or was he “just following orders” issued by his masters at the Canadian Human Rights Commission when he posted the headlined message above on a Freedomsite forum on September 5, 2003? Whatever the answer, the same CHRC that has ruled Bible verses to be hate speech doesn’t seem to consider these words to be a problem. But they are a big problem, for both Richard Warman and the CHRC, and the rest of what he wrote only makes matters worse. “Not only is Canadian Senator Anne Cools is a Negro, she is also an immigrant!
And she is also one helluva preachy c*nt.
She does NOT belong in my Canada. My Anglo-Germanic people were here before
there was a Canada and her kind have jumped in, polluted our race, and forced
their bullshit down our throats.
Time to go back to when the women ni**er imports knew their place…
And that place was NOT in public!
It may be mere coincidence that Richard Warman is in fact an Anglo-German, but it is not likely a coincidence at all that the owner of the website where Richard Warman posted this racist screed against Sen. Anne Cools came under attack by the CHRC shortly after Richard Warman began his complaint-less investigation there.
Complaint-less investigations by the CHRC have been in the news lately because information has surfaced concerning CHRC operative Dean Steacy and his official exploits as ‘Jadewarr’. But compared to his colleague Richard Warman, Dean Steacy is a piker. Richard Warman enters a forum swinging as ’90sAREover’.
In testimony beginning January 29, 2007 Richard Warman admitted under oath in Canadian Human Rights Tribunal hearing (Case T1073/5405) that he was, in fact, the poster named ‘lucy’ who had registered on the Freedomsite (and other) forums. What he neglected to add was that ‘lucy’ was not his first Freedomsite screen name. He failed to mention that his complaint-less investigation of Freedomsite actually began two months before ‘lucy’ hit the scene, it began when he registered on the Freedomsite under the screen name ’90sAREover’.
Another miscalculation by Richard Warman was the technical expertise of the target of this particular setup operation. Marc Lemire is a techie, a networking nerd, so it was not much of a problem for him to find information on both ‘lucy’ and ’90sAREover’ in the Freedomsite database.
The table reproduced below shows information found in the Freedomsite database comparing Richard Warman’s admitted ‘lucy’ identity (left column) to information about ’90sAREover’ (right column). This table infomation was gathered by expert technology witness Bernard Klatt and submitted as evidence to a Canadian Human Rights Tribunal on February 8, 2007.
(If chart is hard to read, go here
Mr. Klatt concludes in Paragraph 71 of his affidavit:
“Based on the information provided in this affidavit, in my expert opinion, I concluded that the Freedomsite message board user accounts “90sAREover” and “lucy” are those of Richard Warman and that Richard Warman was the poster of the message headed “Cools don’t belong in our Senate” posted September 5, 2003.”
There also no doubt that the CHRC was aware of this internet posting by 90sAREover because it was a part of the original complaint filed by Richard Warman, when referred to tribunal. But this posting is no longer a part of the CHRC complaint against Lemire, the CHRC dropped it from the complaint the day after Mr. Lemire won a decision to subpoena Rogers’ internet records.
This posting by 90sAREover would be a slam dunk in a real court of law, so why did the CHRC drop it from the complaint?
This story is far from over because the attacks on Marc Lemire by the CHRC are ongoing and with no end in sight, as are the attacks on many other Canadians by this government agency. This story is also far from being completely told. More ugly twists and turns will be revealed as those at the center of it all give us leave to report the details.
Slowly but surely the truth is coming out.
And it isn’t pretty.
3 thoughts on “Warman: Epithets Unbecoming”
And where is your proof that the chart is legitimate and that the IP address and other information on 90sAREover wasn’t fabricated?
And your proof that the IP records from a neo-nazi website were not falsified or that the posts themselves weren’t rewritten by Stormfront mods as a means of “planting” evidence against Warman?
Yeah, those nazis can be trusted. They’d never do anything underhanded like fabricate evidence.
I have been exploring the question of this identification on my blog. See especially Why there is room for doubt about Richard Warman and the Cools post where I show that the IP in question is a web-caching proxy shared by tens of thousands (perhaps even hundreds of thousands) of Rogers subscribers per day.